We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 10/10 next 2/10  cavellano 2 - 0 PÑSP (383107455)

18182 spectators arrived at highvury, where weather conditions were pretty good for football. Dominic Wasser was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Vladukas Rokus and Edmund Holzschuh. cavellano decided to use a 5-4-1 set up. Lineup: Clavaguera - Druda, Kłyk, Cabello, Wolfegg, Churilov - Hoyos, Fig, Wijsman, Briones - Sol.

PÑSP had chosen a strategic 3-5-2 formation. They fielded: Hasenbichler - Sapoutzakis, Albu, Klepper - Größling, Chikhaoui, Zilberman, Holmberg, Tobiasson - Couch, Clavijo Pérez.

19 minutes in, the referee awarded cavellano a penalty. S. Hoyos coolly slotted it home for a 1 - 0 lead. 1 - 0 was the score after the first half. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by cavellano, with 57 percent of the ball.

After 69 minutes, PÑSP were awarded a free kick as their counter attack broke down. The set piece was lifted over the top, intended to open up the defence. However, the target man seemed to be taken by surprise, and could not reach the ball before it crossed the line for a goal kick. In the lead, cavellano adjusted their style of play with 75 minutes gone. After 75 minutes, the cavellano players received new instructions from their manager on how to keep in control of the game. cavellano's R. Kłyk had to watch the rest of the game from the sidelines, after twisting his ankle with 80 minutes having been played. S. Metso was the replacement. Things were deteriorating for the away team as cavellano scored another to make it 2 - 0 after a left side attack resulted in a goal for I. Sol after 81 minutes. cavellano had most of the ball, with 56 percent of possession.

cavellano's best player was I. Sol. However, U. Clavaguera made a disastrous appearance. The most dominating PÑSP player was without a doubt A. Clavijo Pérez. I. Albu turned in a dismal performance, however. The match ends 2 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield inadequate (high) weak (low) 19 14 5/20 4/20
Right defence formidable (low) solid (very high) 34 28 9/20 7/20
Central defence formidable (high) solid (low) 35 26 9/20 7/20
Left defence formidable (low) solid (very low) 34 25 9/20 7/20
Right attack passable (high) passable (very low) 23 21 6/20 6/20
Central attack weak (very low) inadequate (high) 13 19 4/20 5/20
Left attack excellent (low) inadequate (low) 30 18 8/20 5/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence passable (high) inadequate (high) 23 19 6/20 5/20
Attack weak (very high) inadequate (high) 16 19 4/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)
 
Average midfield inadequate (high) weak (low) 19 14 5/20 4/20
Average defence formidable (low) solid (low) 34 26 9/20 7/20
Average attack passable (low) inadequate (high) 22 19 6/20 5/20
Total average solid (very low) inadequate (very high) 25 20 7/20 5/20
 
 
Server 096