We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 5/10 next 7/10  Husfeldolgozok 0 - 3 Szétrúg-lak (383919606)

The crowd of 13201 turning up at Mészárszék Aréna today were greeted with some nasty showers of rain. Cristóbal Basabilvaso was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Felix Helmholtz and David Hermansson. Everyone was excited about the upcoming Budapest derby and the crowd was divided evenly. Husfeldolgozok decided to use a 4-5-1 set up. The following players had been chosen: Pammu - Uliana, Šiuišys, Talcao, Gasoso - Pichimata, Presilli, Kamarinakis, Kreitlow, Biró - Shamgar.

Szétrúg-lak started off with a 5-4-1 lineup. The following players took the field: Karaklajić - Tárkányi, Krisán, Hatala, Foronda, Trampert - Molinar, Lakatos, Chrustowski, Chylicki - Fazekas.

Husfeldolgozok clearly had decided to counter-attack when they could. 5 minutes into the game, Husfeldolgozok seemed to suffer a certain amount of confusion and they fell to a weak level of organisation. Szétrúg-lak's goal to make the score 0 - 1 came via a questionable penalty, but Z. Chrustowski struck it home without a second thought. Some things can only be learned through experience, and R. Trampert should take his lesson to heart after nearly gifting Husfeldolgozok a goal with 18 minutes of the match played. With the clock showing 22 minutes played, a great pass from the defensive line of Husfeldolgozok resulted in a counterattack that was smoothly brought under control by C. Uliana in the centre of the opposition's penalty area, but his finish went high. Szétrúg-lak's P. Chylicki was shown a yellow card for standing over the ball and blocking an opponent's quick free kick after 27 minutes. After 29 minutes Szétrúg-lak's C. Molinar limped slightly after a late challenge, but he was able to continue. A drive down the left side allowed K. Fazekas to get in close and score another goal for Szétrúg-lak after 38 minutes, taking the score to 0 - 2. The players of Szétrúg-lak now seemed to think the job was done and acted more defensively, just waiting for the ref to blow the final whistle. 0 - 2 was the halftime score. Szétrúg-lak had most of the ball, with 67 percent of possession.

The coach gave his players an extra tactical briefing during the break, and after that Husfeldolgozok had solid organisation. Coming in from the right, Husfeldolgozok had a good opportunity to convert on a counterattack after 62 minutes, but D. Kreitlow's attempt to finish was easily stopped. With 65 minutes played, a quick exchange of passes on the left wing freed K. Fazekas of Szétrúg-lak to slip through the defence and score another goal for the visitors. That made the score 0 - 3. The referee showed Husfeldolgozok's T. Kamarinakis the yellow card after a particularly nasty challenge. Husfeldolgozok were able to draw a foul with their counterattacks, but the shot from J. Pichimata went into the arms of the keeper. Szétrúg-lak claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 64 percent.

Husfeldolgozok's best player was S. Šiuišys. J. Pichimata on the other hand, had a terrible day. Most important Szétrúg-lak player was Z. Chrustowski. V. Foronda was a disappointment, however. The match ends 0 - 3.

Rating details

Midfield poor (very low) weak (very high) 9 16 3/20 4/20
Right defence inadequate (very low) inadequate (high) 17 19 5/20 5/20
Central defence outstanding (low) solid (high) 38 27 10/20 7/20
Left defence solid (high) inadequate (low) 27 18 7/20 5/20
Right attack wretched (low) poor (very high) 6 12 2/20 3/20
Central attack weak (very low) wretched (high) 13 7 4/20 2/20
Left attack wretched (high) passable (very low) 7 21 2/20 6/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence passable (high) inadequate (high) 23 19 6/20 5/20
Attack weak (high) inadequate (high) 15 19 4/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Counter-attacks Normal
Tactic skill brilliant (no tactic) 11 (no tactic) 11/20
 
Average midfield poor (very low) weak (very high) 9 16 3/20 4/20
Average defence solid (high) passable (low) 27 22 7/20 6/20
Average attack poor (very low) weak (very low) 9 13 3/20 4/20
Total average weak (high) inadequate (very low) 15 17 4/20 5/20
 
 
Server 095