We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

01:30 0 - 6 Herkules (290614932)

Due to an all-day shower, 6046 paying spectators got to see a match on a pitch-turned-bog at Ceff. Detlef Sprecher was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Ugis Dreilings and Ryszard Kałas. 01:30 decided to use a 4-3-3 set up. The following players took the field: Kierznowski - Abrahamsen, Svele, Nyhus, Eikeland - Hildrum, Sollie, Karlsen - Johansen, Elseth, Søberg.

Herkules tactics involved an interesting 3-5-2 combination. The following players had been chosen: Lone - Larsen, Sorgdrager, Øvergård - Lavigne, Porup, Andie Jensen, Bombi, Iosub - Karlsen, 興陽 (Xingyang).

Pressing was the tactic of the day for 01:30. Herkules were mostly trying to use their skill at attacking on the flanks. R. Andie Jensen came close to putting the visiting team one up 3 minutes into the match, following a solo raid down the middle, but G. Kierznowski managed to tip the ball to a corner. After 21 minutes Herkules's J. Øvergård contracted a slight foot injury, but didn't want to leave the game. It was a bad day for the usually speedy M. Iosub. The mud seemed to slow him down. After 29 minutes, Herkules put themselves up 0 - 1, as G. Sorgdrager finished off a strike from the left with a real cannonball of a shot. The rain made it hard for players like I. Elseth to show their technical control of the ball on this soggy day. M. Iosub's speed is always a threat when he gets a little room to move, and 35 minutes into the match was no different as he broke free of his man to send a delightful through ball to 陳. 興陽 (Xingyang) who knocked it in for Herkules. 0 - 2! Herkules were determined to attack on the wing and their central attempts were constantly abandoned in favour of the wings. Some fine movement on the left led to a Herkules goal after 37 minutes, making it 0 - 3. 陳. 興陽 (Xingyang) was noted down as the scorer. 01:30 had to make a substitution after 38 minutes. S. Nyhus limped off the field and was replaced by J. Hartvigsen. J. Øvergård of Herkules took advantage of a mistake on the home side's right after 39 minutes which increased the away team's lead to 0 - 4. By now, the players in Herkules felt that victory was guaranteed and began to play it safe, focusing on defence and not risking too much going forward. 0 - 4 was the score after the first half. Herkules enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 79 percent of possession.

With 58 minutes played, a quick exchange of passes on the left wing freed 陳. 興陽 (Xingyang) of Herkules to slip through the defence and score another goal for the visitors. That made the score 0 - 5. That was his third goal of the match - a hat trick for 陳. 興陽 (Xingyang). 62 minutes into the match, the visitors put themselves ahead 0 - 6 as 陳. 興陽 (Xingyang) finished off an attack from the left with a spectacular scissors kick. After 65 minutes of game time, M. Iosub had an excellent opportunity to add to the visitors' lead, clipping a volley hooked in from the right, but G. Kierznowski was in the right place and tipped the ball over for a corner. Herkules had most of the ball, with 78 percent of possession.

01:30's best player was J. Johansen. J. Hartvigsen was a disappointment, however. The most dominating Herkules player was without a doubt B. Porup. On the other hand, M. Iosub's play was disheartening. The match ends 0 - 6.

Rating details

Midfield disastrous (very high) poor (very high) 4 12 1/20 3/20
Right defence poor (high) solid (high) 11 27 3/20 7/20
Central defence poor (low) solid (low) 10 26 3/20 7/20
Left defence poor (low) solid (low) 10 26 3/20 7/20
Right attack poor (high) weak (very high) 11 16 3/20 4/20
Central attack poor (high) wretched (low) 11 6 3/20 2/20
Left attack poor (low) weak (low) 10 14 3/20 4/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence poor (very low) weak (high) 9 15 3/20 4/20
Attack poor (high) poor (very low) 11 9 3/20 3/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Pressing Attack on wings
Tactic skill poor excellent 3 8 3/20 8/20
 
Average midfield disastrous (very high) poor (very high) 4 12 1/20 3/20
Average defence poor (low) solid (low) 10 26 3/20 7/20
Average attack poor (low) poor (very high) 10 12 3/20 3/20
Total average wretched (very high) inadequate (very low) 8 17 2/20 5/20
 
 
Server 096