We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 1/2 next 1/2  Nekas 0 - 10 kataKLIZMA (330178739)

Clear skies welcomed the 6978 spectators who had made their way to Nekas jauns Arena. Manuel Carrillo was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Lars Zanthier and Age Hooman. Nekas decided to use a 4-4-2 set up. Starters: Głos - Buks, Pelns, Grasis, Novickis - Tulpe, Chegodaev, Klimbis, Kalniņš - Zatlers, Kutsin.

kataKLIZMA tactics involved an interesting 3-4-3 combination. Lineup: Duval - Joy, Salceek, Erica - Aitken, Kowolik, Cerbara, Taskov - Štrljić, Palatzas, Estermann.

After 12 minutes, kataKLIZMA's A. Kowolik made his way through the middle and nonchalantly placed the ball out of the keeper's reach, putting the visitors up 0 - 1. After 15 minutes, an incisive pass through the middle gave A. Kowolik a chance to increase the lead for kataKLIZMA, and he did not disappoint. The score was then 0 - 2. The visitors' B. Štrljić took advantage of a misunderstanding between the home side's goalie and centre backs 24 minutes into the match. 0 - 3 for kataKLIZMA. After 38 minutes, kataKLIZMA's A. Kowolik burst through the central defence and let loose a cannonball of a shot, scoring for 0 - 4. By then A. Kowolik had scored three goals - a hat trick! J. Aitken received a delicate pass through the home side's central defence after 39 minutes, and chipped it past the flailing keeper to score making it 0 - 5. The kataKLIZMA fans went wild, whilst the home fans started to think about leaving early. By now, the players in kataKLIZMA felt that victory was guaranteed and began to play it safe, focusing on defence and not risking too much going forward. 0 - 5 was the score after the first half. kataKLIZMA had most of the ball, with 76 percent of possession.

After 70 minutes, kataKLIZMA's I. Palatzas burst through the central defence and let loose a cannonball of a shot, scoring for 0 - 6. After 73 minutes a combination in the middle resulted in a through ball for L. Estermann who increased kataKLIZMA's lead to 0 - 7. After 77 minutes a combination in the middle resulted in a through ball for L. Estermann who increased kataKLIZMA's lead to 0 - 8. A. Pelns of Nekas received a yellow card after 79 minutes for unsportsmanlike behaviour. With 80 minutes played, M. Tulpe of Nekas fell dramatically just outside the penalty area. However, the referee was unimpressed, and booked him for diving. The visitors' L. Estermann took advantage of a misunderstanding between the home side's goalie and centre backs 82 minutes into the match. 0 - 9 for kataKLIZMA. That was his third goal of the match - a hat trick for L. Estermann. kataKLIZMA's B. Štrljić got himself booked for a foul. After 88 minutes, an incisive pass through the middle gave A. Kowolik a chance to increase the lead for kataKLIZMA, and he did not disappoint. The score was then 0 - 10. kataKLIZMA enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 79 percent of possession.

Most important Nekas player was E. Klimbis. P. Buks on the other hand, had a terrible day. kataKLIZMA's top performer was clearly A. Kowolik. On the other hand, D. Joy's play was disheartening. The match ends 0 - 10.

Rating details

Midfield disastrous (very high) weak (very low) 4 13 1/20 4/20
Right defence wretched (low) weak (high) 6 15 2/20 4/20
Central defence poor (very low) solid (very low) 9 25 3/20 7/20
Left defence wretched (high) excellent (very low) 7 29 2/20 8/20
Right attack disastrous (high) passable (very high) 3 24 1/20 6/20
Central attack disastrous (very high) passable (low) 4 22 1/20 6/20
Left attack wretched (low) weak (low) 6 14 2/20 4/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence wretched (very high) weak (very low) 8 13 2/20 4/20
Attack wretched (very high) inadequate (low) 8 18 2/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)
 
Average midfield disastrous (very high) weak (very low) 4 13 1/20 4/20
Average defence wretched (high) passable (high) 7 23 2/20 6/20
Average attack disastrous (very high) inadequate (very high) 4 20 1/20 5/20
Total average wretched (very low) inadequate (high) 5 19 2/20 5/20
 
 
Server 095