We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 2/10 next 4/10 
Overcast weather free of rain made for a turnout of 38896 at jk Vanakoolimehed Arena today. Pekka Rahkonen was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Marcin Cieciura and Leo Artho. Fans of both teams had been eagerly awaiting this Tallinn rivalry match and were doing their best to outshout their opponents. Vanakoolimehed had chosen a strategic 5-3-2 formation. The following players took the field: Madalik - Maksum, Eesmaa, Udal, Hurley, Sinyapkin - Lehepuu, Korsmo, Schaufler - van der Mark, Kandimaa.

Hundu decided to use a 5-4-1 set up. They fielded: Uba - Giani, Laas, Pärn, Peterson, Haav - Kivi, Niidu, Zagaynov, Martini - Desllor.

15 minutes into the game, B. Martini had a great chance to put his team ahead, but his kick from the left went wide. Hundu's U. Haav got himself booked for a foul. Vanakoolimehed took the lead, 1 - 0, after a penalty in minute 31. K. Lehepuu scored from the penalty spot. The clock read 34 minutes and things were deteriorating for the away team as Vanakoolimehed scored another to make it 2 - 0 after a left side attack resulted in a goal for J. van der Mark. 2 - 0 was the halftime score. Possession in this half belonged to Hundu, who had the ball 55 percent of the time.

Some things can only be learned through experience, and A. Hurley should take his lesson to heart after nearly gifting Hundu a goal after 58 minutes. 61 minutes in, M. Desllor made an incredible run up the middle and nearly reduced the home side's lead, but I. Madalik refused to let the ball slip by him. With 64 minutes played, Hundu's I. Niidu limped slightly after a late challenge, but he was able to continue. Hundu set the tempo, maintaining 59 percent of possession.

E. Kandimaa performed admirably for Vanakoolimehed. On the other hand, F. Udal's play was disheartening. Hundu's best player was M. Desllor. K. Uba was a disappointment, however. The match ends 2 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield solid (very low) excellent (very low) 25 29 7/20 8/20
Right defense outstanding (low) inadequate (very high) 38 20 10/20 5/20
Central defense brilliant (low) formidable (low) 42 34 11/20 9/20
Left defense outstanding (low) excellent (high) 38 31 10/20 8/20
Right attack inadequate (high) weak (low) 19 14 5/20 4/20
Central attack excellent (very high) inadequate (very high) 32 20 8/20 5/20
Left attack inadequate (high) solid (very low) 19 25 5/20 7/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defense inadequate (very low) solid (very high) 17 28 5/20 7/20
Attack weak (low) solid (low) 14 26 4/20 7/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)
 

Highlights

1 - 0  K. Lehepuu 31'
2 - 0  J. van der Mark 34'
1 card accumulated U. Haav 19'
Got bruised I. Niidu 64'

Possession

45%
55%
41%
59%
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defense inadequate (very low) solid (very high) 17 28 5/20 7/20
Attack weak (low) solid (low) 14 26 4/20 7/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)

Average ratings

Total player experience weak (very low) passable (very high) 13 24 4/20 6/20
Average midfield solid (very low) excellent (very low) 25 29 7/20 8/20
Average defense outstanding (high) solid (very high) 39 28 10/20 7/20
Average attack passable (high) inadequate (very high) 23 20 6/20 5/20
Total average excellent (very low) solid (low) 29 26 8/20 7/20

Lineup




 
 
Server 096