We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

Qingqi 0 - 2 Spurton

Clouds darkened the skies at Retro as 32328 spectators turned up for the match. Pier Luigi Gubinelli was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Alfonso Lamar and Ladislav Džindo. People from all over Tallinn had joined up for the derby. Qingqi tactics involved an interesting 4-4-2 combination. The following players had been chosen: Ploom - Zaldivar, Metz, Bang, Angen - Druzhkov, Leevike, Brorson, Rehwald - Meesen, Kuzenkov.

Spurton decided to use a 3-5-2 set up. Lineup: Olesker - Gayle, Öke, Romo - Bălan, Bille, Wall, Gangholt, Darmakovičs - Currenti, Fânzeres.

It was obvious that Qingqi were using their pressing skill as their primary tactic. Spurton seemed to prefer attacking in the middle. Qingqi's R. Angen was shown a yellow card after 30 minutes for slicing down an opponent. Qingqi's talent at pressing frustrated the spectators as the game became a dire midfield struggle. At this time in the match, Qingqi were using their skill at pressing to successfully stifle the game. 0 - 0 was the score after the first half. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by Spurton, with 56 percent of the ball.

A. Wall would have preferred to play on, but his coach decided otherwise. C. Strickstrock entered the game for Spurton as the match clock showed 51 minutes. 60 minutes into the game, Spurton wanted to bring some new energy to their game. M. Fânzeres gave M. Fučík a quick hug as he left the field. The terraces were silenced after 62 minutes when Spurton's H. Bille put the guests ahead 0 - 1, following an attack on the right. Spurton's W. Romo made it through the home team's defence on the right hand side 68 minutes into the match. After rounding the keeper, he only had to place the ball in the unguarded goal when a defender slid in and cleared the ball off the line. K. Bang acted foolishly after 70 minutes, giving the ball up to Spurton's J. Currenti who had no trouble finding the back of the net. 0 - 2. Spurton claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 63 percent.

The most dominating Qingqi player was without a doubt I. Leevike. On the other hand, K. Ploom's play was disheartening. J. Currenti performed admirably for Spurton. C. Bălan was a disappointment, however. The match ends 0 - 2.

Rating details

Midfield poor (high) weak (very low) 11 13 3/20 4/20
Right defence inadequate (very low) weak (very low) 17 13 5/20 4/20
Central defence excellent (high) solid (very low) 31 25 8/20 7/20
Left defence passable (very low) weak (low) 21 14 6/20 4/20
Right attack weak (low) inadequate (very low) 14 17 4/20 5/20
Central attack weak (very low) solid (very low) 13 25 4/20 7/20
Left attack weak (low) passable (very low) 14 21 4/20 6/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence solid (very low) inadequate (high) 25 19 7/20 5/20
Attack inadequate (high) inadequate (low) 19 18 5/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Pressing Attack in the Middle
Tactic skill excellent magnificent 8 12 8/20 12/20
 

Highlights

0 - 1  H. Bille 62'
0 - 2  J. Currenti 70'
1 booking accumulated R. Angen 30'
Substitution Out  A. Wall
In  C. Strickstrock
51'
Substitution Out  M. Fânzeres
In  M. Fučík
60'

Possession

44%
56%
37%
63%
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence solid (very low) inadequate (high) 25 19 7/20 5/20
Attack inadequate (high) inadequate (low) 19 18 5/20 5/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Pressing Attack in the Middle
Tactic skill excellent magnificent 8 12 8/20 12/20

Average ratings

Total player experience solid (high) poor (very high) 27 12 7/20 3/20
Average midfield poor (high) weak (very low) 11 13 3/20 4/20
Average defence passable (high) inadequate (very low) 23 17 6/20 5/20
Average attack weak (low) passable (very low) 14 21 4/20 6/20
Total average weak (very high) inadequate (very low) 16 17 4/20 5/20

Lineup




 
 
Server 096