We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 3/4 next 1/4 

F8Team 0 - 0 VELNI

Clear skies welcomed the 35988 spectators who had made their way to Green Garden. Zoltan Meran was the appointed referee. F8Team decided to use a 2-5-3 set up. Starters: Ābols - Suševics-Sušņevics, Pekšēns - Ismaylov, Ķīsis, Ziema, Batēns, Ozols - Kippe, Eeraerts, Kozma.

VELNI had chosen a strategic 4-4-2 formation. Lineup: Muhammed - Kazandzhiev, Krauja, Krievs, Svece - Dalland, Jaunzems, Visockis, Shashenkov - Pētersons, Ģīlis.

Going for long shots seemed to be the strategy in use by VELNI. E. Svece behaved like an inexperienced youth player after 9 minutes as he gave the ball away to N. Ismaylov. Lucky for him though, there was no goal. With 33 minutes played N. Ismaylov almost put the home team one ahead on a cross coming in from the right, but the shot went just wide. Many thought N. Ismaylov ought to have been awarded a penalty 37 minutes into the game, as he went down trying to dribble around P. Muhammed after a determined run through the middle. VELNI mounted an inspired counterattack down the right wing after 38 minutes, but E. Svece was unable to convert from short range. 0 - 0 was the score after the first half. Possession in this half belonged to F8Team, who controlled the ball 67 percent of the time.

F8Team made a bid to take the lead as a ball coming in on the right hand side left E. Kozma completely alone with keeper P. Muhammed, who made a spectacular block. A. Ābols looked great 78 minutes into the match after stopping a shot from the middle of the penalty area from the visitors' P. Pētersons. 79 minutes had elapsed when a great chance for F8Team to take the lead after a good cross from the right found J. Eeraerts alone with the keeper, but he chipped it to the wrong side of the post. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by F8Team, with 69 percent of the ball.

F8Team's best player was U. Ziema. On the other hand, N. Ismaylov's play was disheartening. P. Muhammed performed admirably for VELNI. K. Shashenkov was a disappointment, however. The match ends 0 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield formidable (very high) inadequate (high) 36 19 9/20 5/20
Right defence magnificent (high) mythical (low) 47 66 12/20 17/20
Central defence outstanding (low) extra-terrestrial (very low) 38 61 10/20 16/20
Left defence passable (high) brilliant (very high) 23 44 6/20 11/20
Right attack excellent (very high) weak (very low) 32 13 8/20 4/20
Central attack outstanding (very low) excellent (low) 37 30 10/20 8/20
Left attack inadequate (high) passable (very low) 19 21 5/20 6/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence excellent (low) outstanding (very high) 30 40 8/20 10/20
Attack excellent (very low) excellent (high) 29 31 8/20 8/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Long shots
Tactic skill (no tactic) outstanding (no tactic) 10 10/20
 

Highlights


Possession

67%
33%
69%
31%
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence excellent (low) outstanding (very high) 30 40 8/20 10/20
Attack excellent (very low) excellent (high) 29 31 8/20 8/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Long shots
Tactic skill (no tactic) outstanding (no tactic) 10 10/20

Average ratings

Total player experience solid (very low) formidable (very high) 25 36 7/20 9/20
Average midfield formidable (very high) inadequate (high) 36 19 9/20 5/20
Average defence formidable (very high) titanic (very low) 36 57 9/20 15/20
Average attack excellent (very low) passable (very low) 29 21 8/20 6/20
Total average formidable (low) excellent (very high) 34 32 9/20 9/20

Lineup




 
 
Server 096