We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

Footwork. 7 - 4 PeloTeroS (367707482)

Weather conditions were fairly good for football, and Footwork Arena saw a crowd turnout of 3292. Edu Cadalla was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Raimundo Buendía and Adrian Elsner. Footwork. had chosen a strategic 3-5-2 formation. The following players took the field: Setti - Mar, Świerkowski, Cobos - Ferreira, Lagier, César, Galiza, Jaúrigui - Jota, Lucendo.

A 2-5-3 alignment was the formation of choice for PeloTeroS. Lineup: Casasana - Güiza, Merino Íñiguez - Pardo, Felpeto, Iribarrena, Troya, Aparacio - 才洋 (Caiyang), Mancebo, Bassa.

Footwork. showed off their creative tactics. Footwork. broke through on the left 2 minutes into the game, with J. Galiza firing in from an acute angle to give the home side a 1 - 0 lead. After 11 minutes, the away team failed to deal with a good exchange of passes on the right, and D. Jota gave the Footwork. supporters even more to cheer about when he increased the lead to 2 - 0. Cheers filled the stadium as A. Cobos broke through the visitors' central defence to put away the ball to increase the lead to 3 - 0 to Footwork.. A. Cobos received some harsh words from his coach after he acted foolishly 27 minutes into the match, probably out of lack of experience, and almost let an opponent score. After 28 minutes, PeloTeroS were awarded a free kick. Rather than shooting straight at goal, the taker went for an indirect variant which seemed to take his team mates a bit by surprise. D. Mancebo did attempt a finish, but from an awkward position, sending the ball into the away fans. It was 3 - 0 at the break. PeloTeroS enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 52 percent of possession.

D. Mancebo hit the corner kick straight to the keeper, but it was mishandled, giving PeloTeroS's P. Pardo an easy chance to knock it in for 3 - 1. After 49 minutes, L. Lucendo put Footwork. ahead 4 - 1 when he rose to head in a cross from the right wing. C. Ferreira wanted to play on, but the Footwork. coach had other ideas, and he was replaced 52 minutes into the game by C. Ruz. Content with how the game was proceeding, the Footwork. coach let H. Santa Cruz replace A. Cobos after 76 minutes. The visitors replied 79 minutes into the game, reducing the home side's lead to 4 - 2, as M. Bassa dashed up the middle, easily lobbing the ball over the home team's keeper. The corner kick from D. Felpeto was powerfully met by the head of E. Güiza to make the score 4 - 3. 82 minutes into the match, the visitors' central line of defence had to look on as C. Ruz broke through, making the score 5 - 3 for Footwork.. At this point, it was obvious that the players of Footwork. lowered the tempo and became more defensively oriented. PeloTeroS were desperate to get a goal back and pushed forward through the middle 83 minutes into the game. After a scramble in the box, the ball dropped to 刘. 才洋 (Caiyang), who smashed it home to make the score 5 - 4. After several obvious shirt pulling incidents, D. Mancebo got himself booked. The manager of PeloTeroS was not happy. Footwork.'s J. Lagier increased the lead to 6 - 4, after he saw his shot go between the legs of the advancing goalkeeper following some good play down the right wing after 88 minutes. Footwork. solidified their lead at the 89 minute mark, as P. Świerkowski dribbled the ball through the opposing central defence and scored to make it 7 - 4. The opposing supporters gave the referee an earful when he only gave D. Jota from Footwork. a yellow card after a mistimed challenge from behind 89 minutes into the game. That was far too lenient! Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by PeloTeroS, with 53 percent of the ball.

Most important Footwork. player was J. Lagier. S. Jaúrigui was a disappointment, however. The most dominating PeloTeroS player was without a doubt F. Iribarrena. On the other hand, M. Casasana's play was disheartening. The match ends 7 - 4.

Rating details

Midfield weak (low) weak (high) 14 15 4/20 4/20
Right defence weak (very high) poor (high) 16 11 4/20 3/20
Central defence inadequate (low) poor (low) 18 10 5/20 3/20
Left defence inadequate (low) poor (high) 18 11 5/20 3/20
Right attack inadequate (high) passable (very low) 19 21 5/20 6/20
Central attack weak (very high) passable (very low) 16 21 4/20 6/20
Left attack weak (low) passable (low) 14 22 4/20 6/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence inadequate (very low) inadequate (very low) 17 17 5/20 5/20
Attack weak (very high) inadequate (high) 16 19 4/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Play creatively Normal
Tactic skill - (no tactic) - (no tactic)
 
Average midfield weak (low) weak (high) 14 15 4/20 4/20
Average defence inadequate (very low) poor (high) 17 11 5/20 3/20
Average attack weak (very high) passable (very low) 16 21 4/20 6/20
Total average weak (very high) weak (very high) 16 16 4/20 4/20
 
 
Server 095