We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 4/10 next 6/10 
The crowd of 27579 turning up at Billy Bremners Memorial today were greeted with some nasty showers of rain. Tomi Markkonen was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Herman Askenskär and Célio Couceiro. Fans of both teams had been eagerly awaiting this Østfold rivalry match and were doing their best to outshout their opponents. Naut-team had chosen a strategic 4-4-2 formation. They fielded: Jorge - Kvičius, Oliversson, Sundby, Haugaa - Fjermestad, Castilho, Olsen, Ullens - Verçuni, Bánfalvi.

Munich decided to use a 5-3-2 set up. The following players had been selected: Samaha - Reiten, Stjärnhall, Tryggvesson, Ragnerberg, Lundberg - Seljeseth, Madsen, Kaleja - Holand, Ulvin.

Counter-attacking seemed to be the preferred strategy of Munich. Naut-team's counter-attacks created a good chance for V. Sundby on the right after 25 minutes, but he could only look on with dismay as his strike rebounded off the crossbar. B. Kaleja did not have a good day today, often losing his footing on the muddy pitch. With 28 minutes of the match played, a comedy of errors by the home side gave the visitors a chance at the lead, but A. Reiten, after dashing down on goal from the left and finding himself with only the keeper to beat, sliced his shot horribly wide. Being such a powerful lad, E. Seljeseth hardly even noticed the downpour and fought on through the soupy pitch. Munich's defense sent a ball soaring up the middle on a beautiful counter-attack with 33 minutes gone, but B. Stjärnhall's finish was met by the firm hands of the keeper. 34 minutes into the game, Naut-team had difficulty finding their positions and their organization dropped to solid. Naut-team's D. Kvičius tried to break through the middle repeatedly, but the visitors' defenders were just too alert. With 42 minutes played, D. Kvičius came in from the right with the intention of giving Naut-team the lead, but his rocket of a shot could only rattle the crossbar. 0 - 0 was the halftime score. Naut-team won the midfield battle for the half, with 67 percent possession of the ball.

Naut-team's coach had to raise his voice a little, but he managed to raise his players' organization to solid after reviewing his strategy. Naut-team took the lead, 1 - 0, after a penalty in minute 60. V. Sundby scored from the penalty spot. A counter-attack by Munich after 62 minutes could have resulted in a goal, but V. Lundberg, coming in on the left, waited too long to shoot. Munich mounted an inspired counter-attack down the right wing after 69 minutes, but M. Ulvin was unable to convert from short range. The statistics showed Naut-team in control of the ball, with 67 percent possession.

I. Bánfalvi performed admirably for Naut-team. However, T. Jorge made a disastrous appearance. Munich's top performer was clearly B. Stjärnhall. T. Holand on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 1 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield excellent (very high) weak (high) 32 15 8/20 4/20
Right defense brilliant (very low) titanic (very high) 41 60 11/20 15/20
Central defense magnificent (high) mythical (high) 47 67 12/20 17/20
Left defense brilliant (high) titanic (high) 43 59 11/20 15/20
Right attack weak (low) excellent (very low) 14 29 4/20 8/20
Central attack formidable (high) excellent (high) 35 31 9/20 8/20
Left attack passable (very high) formidable (low) 24 34 6/20 9/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defense excellent (very low) excellent (high) 29 31 8/20 8/20
Attack formidable (very low) inadequate (low) 33 18 9/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Counter-attacks
Tactic skill (no tactic) world class (no tactic) 13 13/20
 

Highlights

1 - 0  V. Sundby 60'

Possession

67%
33%
67%
33%
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defense excellent (very low) excellent (high) 29 31 8/20 8/20
Attack formidable (very low) inadequate (low) 33 18 9/20 5/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Counter-attacks
Tactic skill (no tactic) world class (no tactic) 13 13/20

Average ratings

Total player experience solid (low) solid (low) 26 26 7/20 7/20
Average midfield excellent (very high) weak (high) 32 15 8/20 4/20
Average defense brilliant (very high) extra-terrestrial (low) 44 62 11/20 16/20
Average attack passable (very high) excellent (high) 24 31 6/20 8/20
Total average formidable (very low) formidable (very high) 33 36 9/20 9/20

Lineup




 
 
Server 095