We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 9/10 next 1/10  TEAM 0 - 0 Canape (379539052)

The weather was pretty good, and a crowd of 930 had shown up at ST. CLIMENT'S PARK for the match. Jędrzej Androsiuk was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Jerzy Zawalski and Tadeusz Sikulec. A 3-5-2 alignment was the formation of choice for TEAM. Lineup: Aunes Melchor - Díez de Quijano, Toneu, Ojalvo - Ruiz Ruiz, Navarro Alas, Cerdán, Manzano, Doniániz - Gruilles, Andújar.

Canape had chosen a strategic 5-3-2 formation. They fielded: Brás - Utrera, de Armas, Costea, Schwanitz, Bachev - Ganeroso, Irureta, van Buren - Vargas, Riveros Martín.

TEAM seemed to prefer attacking in the middle. Canape immediately set off using their skill at pressing their opponents. The referee showed TEAM's M. Cerdán the yellow card after a particularly nasty challenge. In a fantastic display of determination, Canape's N. Ganeroso forced himself to his feet, after an opponent viciously knocked him down. TEAM were determined to attack in the middle, even their wing attacks ended up centrally. This was a good period for the visitors, with several opportunities to take the lead, particularly when S. de Armas slipped through the defence on the right to come up alone against F. Aunes Melchor, but the home side's keeper showed his lightning reflexes. Halftime score was 0 - 0. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by Canape, with 56 percent of the ball.

M. Vargas dispatched a majestic long shot 61 minutes into the match, but missed the goal by a few metres. TEAM almost scored after a counterattack 84 minutes into the match, but J. Gruilles took a shot from the left that landed harmlessly in the side of the net. Canape had most of the ball, with 58 percent of possession.

Most important TEAM player was P. Andújar. E. Ruiz Ruiz turned in a dismal performance, however. Canape's top performer was clearly J. Schwanitz. On the other hand, Y. Bachev's play was disheartening. The match ends 0 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield poor (very low) poor (high) 9 11 3/20 3/20
Right defence weak (very low) passable (very low) 13 21 4/20 6/20
Central defence inadequate (high) formidable (very high) 19 36 5/20 9/20
Left defence weak (very low) solid (very low) 13 25 4/20 7/20
Right attack weak (low) poor (low) 14 10 4/20 3/20
Central attack inadequate (high) poor (very high) 19 12 5/20 3/20
Left attack weak (low) wretched (high) 14 7 4/20 2/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence inadequate (very low) weak (very high) 17 16 5/20 4/20
Attack inadequate (very low) weak (very low) 17 13 5/20 4/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack in the Middle Pressing
Tactic skill outstanding inadequate 10 5 10/20 5/20
 
Average midfield poor (very low) poor (high) 9 11 3/20 3/20
Average defence weak (high) solid (high) 15 27 4/20 7/20
Average attack weak (very high) poor (low) 16 10 4/20 3/20
Total average weak (very low) weak (very high) 13 16 4/20 4/20
 
 
Server 096