Woolwich 0 - 2 poinTTurk
(379814436)

06-06-2012 08.45
Clear skies welcomed the 374 spectators who had made their way to
Old Highbury.
Alonso Figueredo was the appointed referee with assistance provided by
Raimon Vera Cordero and
Valentin Dumitrascu.
Woolwich started off with a 4-3-3 lineup.
They fielded: Jarmer - Struja, Jović, Cukrov, Daraei Fard - Kinalski, Martić, Humaloja - Lesieur, Woodworth, Seghers.
poinTTurk decided to use a 5-3-2 set up.
Lineup: Berfin - Jaroszyk, Löw, Schlosser, Deteşan, Mahmudov - Tığlı, Kahraman, Enz - Akova, Er.
Woolwich mostly ignored the flanks in favour of their ability to attack in the middle.
For their match strategy, poinTTurk had decided to use their ability to counter-attack whenever possible.
28 minutes into the game, Woolwich seemed to suffer a certain amount of confusion and they fell to a
passable level of organisation.
poinTTurk were able to draw a foul with their counterattacks, but the shot from
F. Enz went into the arms of the keeper.
38 minutes into the game,
B. Er almost gave the visitors the lead, as he clipped a delicate lob over the keeper, but the ball glanced harmlessly off the crossbar.
39 minutes in, Woolwich appeared unsure on how to play and their organisation was only
inadequate.
Woolwich could have put themselves ahead after 40 minutes but
M. Martić missed a volley shot on a ball coming in from the right.
After several obvious shirt pulling incidents,
S. Woodworth got himself booked. The manager of Woolwich was not happy.
poinTTurk took the lead 44 minutes into the game, making the score 0 - 1 after some elegant movement down the middle.
P. Jaroszyk was the scorer.
44 minutes into the game, Woolwich seemed a little tentative in their play as their organization fell to
weak.
0 - 1 was the score after the first half.
Possession in this half belonged to poinTTurk, who controlled the ball 56 percent of the time.
The coach gave his players an extra tactical briefing during the break, and after that Woolwich had
passable organisation.
J. Löw left the field with a smile on his face as he was substituted 46 minutes into the game, as his team was in the lead.
A. Düzey was the replacement.
The poinTTurk players could smell victory in the air.
C. Deteşan wasn't in a hurry to leave the field as he was substituted for
K. Soyutürk after 46 minutes.
After 65 minutes, poinTTurk's
U. Akova burst through the central defence and let loose a cannonball of a shot, scoring for 0 - 2.
66 minutes into the game, Woolwich had difficulty finding their positions and their organisation dropped to
inadequate.
The coach of poinTTurk was happy with the game so far, but still wanted to change the line up. After 76 minutes,
M. Kırtay came on for
B. Er.
With 78 minutes played,
Ə. Mahmudov nearly put the visitors another one up as he broke through in the middle and fired from just outside the box, but his shot passed just over the bar.
poinTTurk had most of the ball, with 59 percent of possession.
H. Kinalski performed admirably for Woolwich.
On the other hand,
J. Jarmer's play was disheartening.
poinTTurk's best player was
F. Enz.
However,
P. Jaroszyk made a disastrous appearance.
The match ends 0 - 2.
Rating details
|
|
|
| Midfield |
8 |
10 |
 |
 |
| Right defence |
10 |
30 |
 |
 |
| Central defence |
18 |
42 |
 |
 |
| Left defence |
11 |
33 |
 |
 |
| Right attack |
12 |
9 |
 |
 |
| Central attack |
11 |
14 |
 |
 |
| Left attack |
11 |
9 |
 |
 |
| |
| Indirect set pieces |
| Defence |
13 |
17 |
 |
 |
| Attack |
11 |
12 |
 |
 |
| |
| Team attitude |
(Hidden) |
(Hidden) |
| Tactic |
Attack in the Middle |
Counter-attacks |
| Tactic skill |
11 |
8 |
 |
 |
| |
| Average midfield |
8 |
10 |
 |
 |
| Average defence |
13 |
35 |
 |
 |
| Average attack |
11 |
10 |
 |
 |
| Total average |
11 |
18 |
 |
 |