We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 1/10 next 3/10  ro-mitza 0 - 0 P.R.M (380842878)

25994 spectators had come to Santiago Derbedeu this cloudy day. Alberto 'Boba' Bobadilla was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Isaltino Roupeira and Tal Sharabi. ro-mitza tactics involved an interesting 4-5-1 combination. The following players took the field: Severinsen - Bellavicolo, Pradelles, Uhlemann, Schnitter - Zanca, Rakitski, Tacoronte, Holverda, Folo - Ham.

P.R.M started off with a 4-3-3 lineup. Starters: Stagnaro - Kolár, Guisse, Maguolo, Stohler - Hansson, Rantakoski, Alberdi - Melandri, Maljković, Funcke.

ro-mitza immediately set off using their skill at pressing their opponents. Counter-attacking seemed to be the preferred strategy of P.R.M. ro-mitza's O. Uhlemann was shown a yellow card after 34 minutes for slicing down an opponent. 0 - 0 was the score after the first half. ro-mitza claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 65 percent.

Given a free kick in a difficult position after 47 minutes, ro-mitza tried a variation that they had practised in training. The kick was sent into the area just in front of the keeper. However, the defence were on their toes and allowed no space for a finish. P.R.M's defence sent a ball soaring up the middle on a beautiful counterattack with 48 minutes gone, but L. Alberdi's finish was met by the reaching hands of the keeper. 56 minutes had elapsed when a great chance for ro-mitza to take the lead after a good cross from the right found S. Schnitter alone with the keeper, but he chipped it to the wrong side of the post. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by ro-mitza, with 66 percent of the ball.

ro-mitza's top performer was clearly J. Ham. A. Folo was a disappointment, however. The most dominating P.R.M player was without a doubt M. Maguolo. C. Stagnaro turned in a dismal performance, however. The match ends 0 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield solid (very low) weak (very low) 25 13 7/20 4/20
Right defence outstanding (very high) solid (very low) 40 25 10/20 7/20
Central defence magnificent (high) excellent (very high) 47 32 12/20 8/20
Left defence brilliant (very high) excellent (very low) 44 29 11/20 8/20
Right attack weak (low) weak (very low) 14 13 4/20 4/20
Central attack inadequate (low) solid (very high) 18 28 5/20 7/20
Left attack weak (very low) weak (very low) 13 13 4/20 4/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence solid (low) passable (low) 26 22 7/20 6/20
Attack passable (high) inadequate (very high) 23 20 6/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Pressing Counter-attacks
Tactic skill passable outstanding 6 10 6/20 10/20
 
Average midfield solid (very low) weak (very low) 25 13 7/20 4/20
Average defence brilliant (very high) excellent (very low) 44 29 11/20 8/20
Average attack weak (high) inadequate (low) 15 18 4/20 5/20
Total average solid (very high) inadequate (very high) 28 20 7/20 5/20
 
 
Server 095