We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 4/4 next 2/4  Pingviini 0 - 9 armaniatkalrunakaij (381545135)

13762 spectators arrived at Teftford arena, where weather conditions were pretty good for football. Roberts Calmans was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Helmi Winteler and René Swagemakers. Pingviini started off with a 4-4-2 lineup. The following players took the field: Pētersons - Vakhrin, Ozols, Peldekss, Voronov - Zhigach, Cingulis, Slaidiņš, Pavlov - Landrats, Khugaev.

A 3-4-3 alignment was the formation of choice for armaniatkalrunakaij. Lineup: Gronskis - Garon, Muzyka, Góngora - Baltušs, Uguns, Pauliankovich, Viļķēns - Ežmalis, Ershov, Almendros.

armaniatkalrunakaij clearly preferred using their ability to attack in the middle. After 16 minutes, armaniatkalrunakaij's M. Baltušs made his way through the middle and nonchalantly placed the ball out of the keeper's reach, putting the visitors up 0 - 1. armaniatkalrunakaij were determined to attack in the middle, even their wing attacks ended up centrally. After 26 minutes a combination in the middle resulted in a through ball for A. Uguns who increased armaniatkalrunakaij's lead to 0 - 2. M. Baltušs increased the visitors' lead by putting a volley away after a pass from the right. 0 - 3. At this point, it was obvious that the players of armaniatkalrunakaij lowered the tempo and became more defensively oriented. M. Viļķēns received a delicate pass through the home side's central defence after 34 minutes, and chipped it past the flailing keeper to score making it 0 - 4. The armaniatkalrunakaij fans went wild, whilst the home fans started to think about leaving early. 0 - 4 was the halftime score. armaniatkalrunakaij had most of the ball, with 72 percent of possession.

The home crowd was not impressed when M. Baltušs came in from the right, shooting hard to score after 49 minutes. armaniatkalrunakaij were now up 0 - 5. By then M. Baltušs had scored three goals - a hat trick! A. Pavlov of Pingviini was booked for kicking the ball away after the whistle. M. Ežmalis was the first to reach the corner kick, but his header was blocked by the keeper. However, armaniatkalrunakaij's M. Ershov managed to get hold of the rebound and tucked the ball into the empty net. 0 - 6 After 61 minutes, armaniatkalrunakaij's J. Almendros burst through the central defence and let loose a cannonball of a shot, scoring for 0 - 7. After 62 minutes, an incisive pass through the middle gave M. Viļķēns a chance to increase the lead for armaniatkalrunakaij, and he did not disappoint. The score was then 0 - 8. With 66 minutes played, G. Voronov of Pingviini fell dramatically just outside the penalty area. However, the referee was unimpressed, and booked him for diving. 69 minutes into the game, armaniatkalrunakaij worked the left side industriously creating several opportunities to add to their lead, but just couldn't apply the finishing touch. The visitors' M. Ežmalis took advantage of a misunderstanding between the home side's goalie and centre backs 70 minutes into the match. 0 - 9 for armaniatkalrunakaij. In the lead, armaniatkalrunakaij adjusted their style of play with 78 minutes gone. armaniatkalrunakaij claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 77 percent.

Most important Pingviini player was M. Zhigach. G. Pētersons on the other hand, had a terrible day. J. Góngora performed admirably for armaniatkalrunakaij. A. Gronskis was a disappointment, however. The match ends 0 - 9.

Rating details

Midfield disastrous (very high) wretched (very high) 4 8 1/20 2/20
Right defence wretched (low) inadequate (very low) 6 17 2/20 5/20
Central defence wretched (very low) passable (low) 5 22 2/20 6/20
Left defence disastrous (very high) poor (very low) 4 9 1/20 3/20
Right attack wretched (low) weak (high) 6 15 2/20 4/20
Central attack wretched (low) weak (very low) 6 13 2/20 4/20
Left attack wretched (low) wretched (low) 6 6 2/20 2/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence wretched (high) inadequate (low) 7 18 2/20 5/20
Attack wretched (very high) inadequate (high) 8 19 2/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Attack in the Middle
Tactic skill (no tactic) formidable (no tactic) 9 9/20
 
Average midfield disastrous (very high) wretched (very high) 4 8 1/20 2/20
Average defence wretched (very low) weak (very high) 5 16 2/20 4/20
Average attack wretched (low) poor (high) 6 11 2/20 3/20
Total average wretched (very low) poor (very high) 5 12 2/20 3/20
 
 
Server 096