We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 10/10 next 2/10  F.C.Gak 1 - 1 kicma (382624981)

A brilliantly sunny day had enticed a crowd of 41209 to Ernst Hapoel. Hélio Cassiano was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Tom Pedersen and Guido Maccioni. F.C.Gak tactics involved an interesting 3-5-2 combination. They fielded: Seybold - Nikolakopoulos, N'Diaye, van der Heijden - Jamanta, Domazet, Bühler, Samardžija, Merwart - Zazzetta, Sjögren.

kicma started off with a 3-5-2 lineup. Starters: Bøgild - Olmedo Halcón, Nissin, Schneiderman - Puşcaşu, Maleškić, Malantrucco, Lalatović, Guerville - Martins, Bellavite Pellegrini.

It was an obvious ambition of kicma to use their ability at attacking on the flanks. With 4 minutes played, the home side managed to get a 1 - 0 lead as Z. Jamanta flipped the ball in after a cross from the right. C. Puşcaşu tried using a burst of speed to get past his defender after 13 minutes, but it takes more than that to get past fast Q. van der Heijden. The teams went for the halftime break at 1 - 0. F.C.Gak claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 51 percent.

After 70 minutes, kicma sent a free kick in high over the penalty box. In what looked like a well-rehearsed move, the ball was headed backwards and reached E. Maleškić, who had plenty of space to place a well aimed shot - 1 - 1. The home crowd breathed a collective sigh of relief when E. Maleškić was unable to put the ball in the net after his show of skill down the left 75 minutes into the match. He was seen beating the pitch in frustration at missing such a good chance to give his team the lead! kicma had most of the ball, with 51 percent of possession.

F.C.Gak's best player was T. Sjögren. However, E. N'Diaye made a disastrous appearance. The most dominating kicma player was without a doubt E. Maleškić. On the other hand, F. Bøgild's play was disheartening. The match ends 1 - 1.

Rating details

Midfield excellent (low) solid (high) 30 27 8/20 7/20
Right defence outstanding (low) solid (high) 38 27 10/20 7/20
Central defence excellent (high) brilliant (very high) 31 44 8/20 11/20
Left defence excellent (very low) excellent (low) 29 30 8/20 8/20
Right attack passable (very high) solid (high) 24 27 6/20 7/20
Central attack solid (low) formidable (very low) 26 33 7/20 9/20
Left attack passable (high) excellent (low) 23 30 6/20 8/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence passable (high) solid (low) 23 26 6/20 7/20
Attack solid (very low) passable (high) 25 23 7/20 6/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Attack on wings
Tactic skill (no tactic) titanic (no tactic) 15 15/20
 
Average midfield excellent (low) solid (high) 30 27 8/20 7/20
Average defence formidable (very low) formidable (very low) 33 33 9/20 9/20
Average attack passable (very high) excellent (low) 24 30 6/20 8/20
Total average excellent (very low) excellent (low) 29 30 8/20 8/20
 
 
Server 096