We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

bandulhos 7 - 0 Qenk (382897774)

The 22088 spectators at Campo Municipal dos Entulhos were in for an afternoon of sunshine. Alexander Aarons was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Lassi Åkerblom and Wolfgünter Hinkel. bandulhos started off with a 4-4-2 lineup. Starters: Valdés Velázquez - Moro, Aganzo, Passada, Gálvez - Bakhuis, Zurlo, Lauriola, Capitelli - Ballonga, Balcol.

Qenk had chosen a strategic 5-3-2 formation. The following players had been chosen: Brokmose - Bierce-Thomas, Arbeitman, Franck, Kechagias, Cosar - Ecklund, Conceição, Serbãnescu - Mavrovič, Casajús.

Having been awarded a free kick in an awkward position after 5 minutes, bandulhos did not go for a shot but instead fired the ball hard into the 6 yard box. After a brief tussle with his marker, F. Balcol was able to power the ball past the keeper to make the score 1 - 0. The visitors' equaliser seemed sure to come after 6 minutes, following a one on one situation around the left hand side of the goal area, but R. Valdés Velázquez got the best of it, blocking the shot from A. Bierce-Thomas. Cheers filled the stadium as F. Balcol broke through the visitors' central defence to put away the ball to increase the lead to 2 - 0 to bandulhos. 29 minutes in, bandulhos appeared unsure on how to play and their organisation was only passable. With 31 minutes played, bandulhos's D. Capitelli almost extended the lead, but his shot from the left glanced off the top of the bar to fall behind the net. After 36 minutes, the away team failed to deal with a good exchange of passes on the right, and G. Zurlo gave the bandulhos supporters even more to cheer about when he increased the lead to 3 - 0. Confident in their lead, bandulhos's players relaxed and focused more on defending the lead than increasing it. bandulhos put themselves up 4 - 0 when N. Ballonga broke through on the right, leaving the entire defence trailing in his wake. A magnificent combination in the middle resulted in bandulhos's F. Balcol increasing the lead to 5 - 0. That made three goals for F. Balcol and he was marked down for the hat trick. 5 - 0 was the halftime score. Possession in this half belonged to bandulhos, who controlled the ball 74 percent of the time.

Despite his frustration resulting in the smashing of a few teacups, the coach of bandulhos was able to get his message across, and raised bandulhos's organisation to solid. bandulhos managed to extend their lead to 6 - 0 when F. Balcol cut in neatly from the left side and struck a fine shot past the away team's goalkeeper. bandulhos put in a good effort on the right, but F. Balcol saw his volley fly wide of the mark 64 minutes into the game. 68 minutes into the game, bandulhos seemed a little tentative in their play as their organization fell to passable. The coach of bandulhos was happy with the game so far, but still wanted to change the line up. After 69 minutes, A. Mañón came on for G. Zurlo. The bandulhos captaincy was handed to A. Mañón. Qenk's O. Kechagias was shown a yellow card after 70 minutes for slicing down an opponent. With 77 minutes played, bandulhos put themselves up 7 - 0 when the visiting defenders lost the ball to F. Balcol, who came up from the left and proceeded to coolly round the keeper and knock the ball home. 79 minutes into the game, bandulhos seemed to suffer a certain amount of confusion and they fell to a passable level of organisation. 80 minutes into the game, bandulhos had difficulty finding their positions and their organisation dropped to inadequate. bandulhos claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 77 percent.

bandulhos's best player was F. Balcol. R. Valdés Velázquez was a disappointment, however. M. Arbeitman performed admirably for Qenk. F. Brokmose on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 7 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield inadequate (high) wretched (high) 19 7 5/20 2/20
Right defence formidable (low) weak (high) 34 15 9/20 4/20
Central defence brilliant (low) inadequate (very high) 42 20 11/20 5/20
Left defence excellent (high) poor (very high) 31 12 8/20 3/20
Right attack solid (very high) disastrous (high) 28 3 7/20 1/20
Central attack solid (low) disastrous (low) 26 2 7/20 1/20
Left attack excellent (very high) disastrous (high) 32 3 8/20 1/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence solid (high) weak (low) 27 14 7/20 4/20
Attack passable (low) poor (very high) 22 12 6/20 3/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)
 
Average midfield inadequate (high) wretched (high) 19 7 5/20 2/20
Average defence formidable (very high) weak (very high) 36 16 9/20 4/20
Average attack excellent (very low) disastrous (high) 29 3 8/20 1/20
Total average solid (very high) poor (very low) 28 9 7/20 3/20
 
 
Server 096