We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 1/4 next 3/4  rampiñador 0 - 8 STEM (383212245)

Fairly good weather for football had drawn a crowd of 6131 to Al capone. Kryštof Miškovský was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Ambrosi Budmiger and Leo Juřena. rampiñador started off with a 4-4-2 lineup. The following players had been chosen: Molero - Eslava, Albán, Narbona, Frade - Ribert, Teixidó, Plaza, Piqueres - Bañueta, Antón.

A 3-5-2 alignment was the formation of choice for STEM. They fielded: Cheshmedzhiev - Asıf, Arbulú, Jokitalo - Kyachin, Symerský, Blog, Elkins, Ardoino - Roig, Ingemann.

STEM tried to focus their attacks down the middle. 9 minutes into the game, U. Ingemann was a hair's breadth away from giving STEM the lead with a shot from over on the left. A prompt block by I. Molero saved the home team that time. It was obvious that team STEM had instructions to attack in the middle instead of on the wings. A mistake by the home side's central defence after 15 minutes allowed D. Elkins to score for STEM. The scoreboard now read 0 - 1. After several obvious shirt pulling incidents, F. Frade got himself booked. The manager of rampiñador was not happy. U. Ingemann of STEM took advantage of a mistake on the home side's right after 27 minutes which increased the away team's lead to 0 - 2. H. Arbulú received a delicate pass through the home side's central defence after 31 minutes, and chipped it past the flailing keeper to score making it 0 - 3. The STEM fans went wild, whilst the home fans started to think about leaving early. At this point, it was obvious that the players of STEM lowered the tempo and became more defensively oriented. Halftime score was 0 - 3. STEM enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 85 percent of possession.

With 51 minutes played, STEM put themselves up 0 - 4 after an attack from the right, caused by a defensive blunder. The scorer was D. Elkins. Content with how the game was proceeding, the STEM coach let J. de la Flor replace À. Roig after 54 minutes. Central attacks were the recipe of the day for STEM, as they moved the ball from the wings to the middle with startling regularity. After 55 minutes, an incisive pass through the middle gave J. de la Flor a chance to increase the lead for STEM, and he did not disappoint. The score was then 0 - 5. After 62 minutes, a mistake by the home side's left defence allowed N. Ardoino to get through. He outclassed the home side's keeper, adding another goal for the visitors. 0 - 6. Some things can only be learned through experience, and F. Frade should take his lesson to heart after nearly gifting STEM a goal with 66 minutes of the match played. With 67 minutes played, a quick exchange of passes on the left wing freed D. Blog of STEM to slip through the defence and score another goal for the visitors. That made the score 0 - 7. D. Blog of STEM was booked for kicking the ball away after the whistle. 75 minutes into the match, the visitors put themselves ahead 0 - 8 as U. Ingemann finished off an attack from the left with a spectacular scissors kick. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by STEM, with 87 percent of the ball.

Most important rampiñador player was V. Antón. However, I. Molero made a disastrous appearance. STEM's best player was U. Ingemann. J. de la Flor turned in a dismal performance, however. The match ends 0 - 8.

Rating details

Midfield disastrous (very high) inadequate (low) 4 18 1/20 5/20
Right defence disastrous (very high) inadequate (high) 4 19 1/20 5/20
Central defence wretched (low) outstanding (high) 6 39 2/20 10/20
Left defence wretched (high) inadequate (high) 7 19 2/20 5/20
Right attack wretched (low) inadequate (very low) 6 17 2/20 5/20
Central attack wretched (low) passable (very high) 6 24 2/20 6/20
Left attack wretched (very low) inadequate (very low) 5 17 2/20 5/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence wretched (very high) inadequate (low) 8 18 2/20 5/20
Attack poor (very low) inadequate (very low) 9 17 3/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Attack in the Middle
Tactic skill (no tactic) world class (no tactic) 13 13/20
 
Average midfield disastrous (very high) inadequate (low) 4 18 1/20 5/20
Average defence wretched (low) solid (low) 6 26 2/20 7/20
Average attack wretched (low) inadequate (high) 6 19 2/20 5/20
Total average wretched (very low) passable (very low) 5 21 2/20 6/20
 
 
Server 096