We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 3/10 next 5/10  Sigmaclub 5 - 0 beginners (386938421)

A brilliantly sunny day had enticed a crowd of 39033 to Osaka Big Arch. Thomas Apelbrant was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Paco Trejo and Juan Antonio Seixas. Sigmaclub tactics involved an interesting 3-4-3 combination. Starters: Garví - Komisarek, Stefanović, Eijsvogel - Stålby, Llanos, Schael, Fauth - Bardócz, Lagorce, Bühnemann.

beginners decided to use a 3-5-2 set up. The following players had been chosen: 岡本 (Okamoto) - 服部 (Hattori), 越智 (Ochi), 中野 (Nakano) - 田島 (Tajima), 宮田 (Miyata), 小島 (Kojima), Boll, 西川 (Nishikawa) - Costa, 中川 (Nakagawa).

Sigmaclub were mostly trying to use their skill at attacking on the flanks. The visitors' central defence should have had no trouble clearing the pass to O. Fauth, but the Sigmaclub player managed to shrug them off and fired a low shot past the keeper to give his team the lead. 1 - 0! Attacking on the wings was the choice for Sigmaclub, and they were successfully passing the ball from the middle to the wings to attack. With 33 minutes played, Sigmaclub put themselves up 2 - 0 when the visiting defenders lost the ball to S. Bühnemann, who came up from the left and proceeded to coolly round the keeper and knock the ball home. After 34 minutes, the away team failed to deal with a good exchange of passes on the right, and O. Fauth gave the Sigmaclub supporters even more to cheer about when he increased the lead to 3 - 0. At this point, it was obvious that the players of Sigmaclub lowered the tempo and became more defensively oriented. With 39 minutes played, 隆. 西川 (Nishikawa) had a fantastic opportunity to reply but his shot flew harmlessly into the side-netting of the goal. Halftime score was 3 - 0. Possession in this half belonged to Sigmaclub, who controlled the ball 64 percent of the time.

Sigmaclub had a good opportunity to attack in the middle, but remembered their instructions to focus on wing attacks instead. Sigmaclub put in a good effort on the right, but G. Eijsvogel saw his volley fly wide of the mark 48 minutes into the game. 宏. 中野 (Nakano) wasn't much help defensively. His energy-consuming forward runs proved quite costly in the oppressive heat. Players in Sigmaclub heard their coach's words ringing in their ears and steered their central attacks to the wings instead. Things were deteriorating for the away team as Sigmaclub scored another to make it 4 - 0 after a left side attack resulted in a goal for Ö. Stålby after 68 minutes. Sigmaclub's S. Lagorce increased the lead to 5 - 0, after he saw his shot go between the legs of the advancing goalkeeper following some good play down the right wing after 83 minutes. 大. 越智 (Ochi)'s technique was perfect on this sunny day and led to some breathtaking tricks that bamboozled the defence. Sigmaclub claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 67 percent.

Sigmaclub's top performer was clearly E. Llanos. On the other hand, G. Eijsvogel's play was disheartening. The most dominating beginners player was without a doubt 昭. 小島 (Kojima). 隆. 田島 (Tajima) on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 5 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield inadequate (very low) poor (low) 17 10 5/20 3/20
Right defence solid (very high) weak (very low) 28 13 7/20 4/20
Central defence excellent (low) passable (high) 30 23 8/20 6/20
Left defence solid (very high) weak (low) 28 14 7/20 4/20
Right attack solid (high) wretched (very high) 27 8 7/20 2/20
Central attack passable (low) poor (very high) 22 12 6/20 3/20
Left attack solid (high) poor (very high) 27 12 7/20 3/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence passable (low) inadequate (very low) 22 17 6/20 5/20
Attack inadequate (very high) weak (very high) 20 16 5/20 4/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Normal
Tactic skill mythical (no tactic) 17 (no tactic) 17/20
 
Average midfield inadequate (very low) poor (low) 17 10 5/20 3/20
Average defence excellent (very low) inadequate (very low) 29 17 8/20 5/20
Average attack solid (low) poor (high) 26 11 7/20 3/20
Total average passable (very high) weak (very low) 24 13 6/20 4/20
 
 
Server 095