We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 1/10 next 3/10  Uinskas 9 - 0 tajimi-catseye (386939860)

Dark skies made the crowd of 29279 at Estadio Uinskas a little nervous, but the rain held off. Antoon Praet was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Emmanuel Bacot and Leonard C. Häggbo. Uinskas decided to use a 2-5-3 set up. Starters: Soncini - 熊谷 (Kumagaya), 松尾 (Matsuo) - 松村 (Matsumura), Varela Dias, 丸山 (Maruyama), da Silva Sá, Saat - 山田 (Yamada), 宮本 (Miyamoto), Tuma.

tajimi-catseye tactics involved an interesting 4-4-2 combination. The following players had been chosen: 清水 (Shimizu) - 松田 (Matsuda), 村石 (Muraishi), 黒瀬 (Kurose), 山方 (Yamagata) - 石塚 (Ishizuka), 竹内 (Takeuchi), 福冨 (Fukutomi), 高森 (Takamori) - 佐野 (Sano), 谷村 (Tanimura).

Uinskas saw most attack opportunities on the wings. Uinskas took the lead 4 minutes in, as 啓. 宮本 (Miyamoto) broke through on the left and put the 1 - 0 shot just beyond the reach of the outstretched keeper. tajimi-catseye's 剛. 村石 (Muraishi) got himself booked for a foul. Uinskas were determined to attack on the wing and their central attempts were constantly abandoned in favour of the wings. After 12 minutes, J. da Silva Sá put Uinskas ahead 2 - 0 when he rose to head in a cross from the right wing. With 25 minutes played, 優. 丸山 (Maruyama) of Uinskas fell dramatically just outside the penalty area. However, the referee was unimpressed, and booked him for diving. Uinskas's L. Saat proved that he's been around on a football pitch before, when he took advantage of a few moments of confusion in the opposition's defensive line and elegantly scored for 3 - 0. By now, the players in Uinskas felt that victory was guaranteed and began to play it safe, focusing on defence and not risking too much going forward. With 30 minutes played, Uinskas put themselves up 4 - 0 when the visiting defenders lost the ball to 高. 山田 (Yamada), who came up from the left and proceeded to coolly round the keeper and knock the ball home. Given a free kick close to the byline, Uinskas tried a move that loyal fans may recognise from training. A pass to the side pulled the defence out of position which let L. Saat slip through on goal. He didn't have to break his stride, and slipped the ball past the keeper to make it 5 - 0, 35 minutes into the game. The teams went for the halftime break at 5 - 0. Uinskas enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 80 percent of possession.

Uinskas managed to extend their lead to 6 - 0 when 啓. 宮本 (Miyamoto) cut in neatly from the left side and struck a fine shot past the away team's goalkeeper. Things were going to get worse for the visitors. Q. Tuma squirmed through their central defence after 66 minutes, increasing the lead to 7 - 0. Players in Uinskas heard their coach's words ringing in their ears and steered their central attacks to the wings instead. Uinskas put in a good effort on the right, but 優. 丸山 (Maruyama) saw his volley fly wide of the mark 68 minutes into the game. Things were deteriorating for the away team as Uinskas scored another to make it 8 - 0 after a left side attack resulted in a goal for 高. 山田 (Yamada) after 71 minutes. Uinskas's 優. 丸山 (Maruyama) increased the lead to 9 - 0, after he saw his shot go between the legs of the advancing goalkeeper following some good play down the right wing after 74 minutes. Possession in this half belonged to Uinskas, who controlled the ball 83 percent of the time.

Uinskas's best player was 高. 山田 (Yamada). 章. 松尾 (Matsuo) was a disappointment, however. Most important tajimi-catseye player was 直. 佐野 (Sano). However, 宏. 高森 (Takamori) made a disastrous appearance. The match ends 9 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield poor (low) disastrous (high) 10 3 3/20 1/20
Right defence weak (high) wretched (high) 15 7 4/20 2/20
Central defence inadequate (low) poor (very low) 18 9 5/20 3/20
Left defence weak (low) wretched (low) 14 6 4/20 2/20
Right attack outstanding (very low) wretched (very high) 37 8 10/20 2/20
Central attack solid (very high) wretched (very low) 28 5 7/20 2/20
Left attack formidable (high) disastrous (very high) 35 4 9/20 1/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence passable (high) poor (very low) 23 9 6/20 3/20
Attack excellent (low) poor (very low) 30 9 8/20 3/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Normal
Tactic skill mythical (no tactic) 17 (no tactic) 17/20
 
Average midfield poor (low) disastrous (high) 10 3 3/20 1/20
Average defence weak (very high) wretched (high) 16 7 4/20 2/20
Average attack formidable (very low) wretched (low) 33 6 9/20 2/20
Total average inadequate (very high) wretched (very low) 20 5 5/20 2/20
 
 
Server 096