We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 7/10 next 9/10  Łabędy 2 - 2 Butterflies (387668620)

The weather was pretty good, and a crowd of 3347 had shown up at Łabędy Team Arena for the match. Valdas Baltakis was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Jesus Philippi and Oskar Desanghere. Łabędy had chosen a strategic 4-4-2 formation. Starters: Basik - Puczko, Cichosz, Bałys, Labocha - Sawko, Zarczuk, Mackiewicz, Napieraj - Puźniak, Komosa.

A 4-4-2 alignment was the formation of choice for Butterflies. Lineup: Pinta - Vroemen, Nastały, Ardifio, Cebero - Ramza, Lutomski, Jorge, Guichard - da Silva, Allariz.

Butterflies tried to focus their attacks down the middle. 16 minutes into the match and the home team took a 1 - 0 lead after breaking through on the left. The scorer for Łabędy was I. Bałys. The visitors' A. da Silva was alert after a cross coming in from the left, levelling the score at 1 - 1 after 22 minutes. Łabędy's M. Napieraj had to watch the rest of the game from the sidelines, after twisting his ankle with 29 minutes having been played. W. Kunik was the replacement. Making his way up the middle 34 minutes into the match, I. Bałys almost managed to squeeze a goal past the visitors' keeper, but the alert E. Pinta blocked it to keep the score level. Butterflies players heard their coach's words ringing in their ears and steered their wing attacks to the middle instead. After 40 minutes, Butterflies's J. Nastały made his way through the middle and nonchalantly placed the ball out of the keeper's reach, putting the visitors up 1 - 2. 42 minutes into the game, I. Bałys had to leave the pitch due to a knee injury. In came J. Sopniewski. 43 minutes into the match, Łabędy's J. Puczko maneuvered his way around the opposition on the left flank, delighting the crowd with his twists and turns. The effort paid off as the ball found the back of the net, evening the score at 2 - 2. 2 - 2 was the halftime score. Łabędy enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 52 percent of possession.

After 52 minutes Łabędy's M. Zarczuk contracted a slight foot injury, but didn't want to leave the game. After 55 minutes, the Butterflies coach wanted to see a new face on the pitch, waving P. Lutomski off the field. O. Nuzzo took his place. With the match clock at 62 minutes, Butterflies modified their style of play a little bit. At 64 minutes played, A. Mackiewicz came in from the right with the intention of giving Łabędy the lead, but his rocket of a shot rattled the crossbar. As the 65 minute mark approached, the Butterflies coach decided it was time for a substitution. J. Ramza reluctantly made way for M. Lourdin on the pitch. 67 minutes into the match, the referee signalled for a Butterflies substitution. J. Kowalik came on for A. da Silva. The home crowd breathed a collective sigh of relief when N. Guichard was unable to put the ball in the net after his show of skill down the left 70 minutes into the match. He was seen beating the pitch in frustration at missing such a good chance to give his team the lead! Butterflies had most of the ball, with 52 percent of possession.

The most dominating Łabędy player was without a doubt J. Komosa. S. Basik on the other hand, had a terrible day. Butterflies's best player was A. Allariz. However, W. Vroemen made a disastrous appearance. The match ends 2 - 2.

Rating details

Midfield wretched (high) wretched (low) 7 6 2/20 2/20
Right defence poor (low) weak (low) 10 14 3/20 4/20
Central defence weak (low) passable (very low) 14 21 4/20 6/20
Left defence weak (high) weak (very high) 15 16 4/20 4/20
Right attack poor (very low) weak (low) 9 14 3/20 4/20
Central attack wretched (very high) weak (very high) 8 16 2/20 4/20
Left attack poor (low) inadequate (very high) 10 20 3/20 5/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence poor (very high) weak (very high) 12 16 3/20 4/20
Attack weak (very low) poor (very high) 13 12 4/20 3/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Attack in the Middle
Tactic skill (no tactic) formidable (no tactic) 9 9/20
 
Average midfield wretched (high) wretched (low) 7 6 2/20 2/20
Average defence weak (very low) inadequate (very low) 13 17 4/20 5/20
Average attack poor (very low) inadequate (very low) 9 17 3/20 5/20
Total average poor (low) weak (very low) 10 13 3/20 4/20
 
 
Server 095