We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 5/10 next 7/10  sharif 4 - 0 GG-TEAM (389295462)

Weather conditions were fairly good for football, and Nou Camp Ased Sharif saw a crowd turnout of 25735. Abel Varano was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Kleofas Wichniewicz and Teodor Apelholt. sharif decided to use a 3-4-3 set up. Starters: Čmolík - Bathgate, Laurenza, Bouleau - Isquist, Söderström, Bonomi, Jiménez Yepes - Boissevain, Rogers, Canou.

GG-TEAM tactics involved an interesting 3-5-2 combination. They fielded: Jansson - Azhari, Abolfazli, Haji Bandeh - Azarang, Asgari, Azadvari, Pashanejad, Mohammadkhani - Gharani, Ţăranu.

sharif used their ability to concentrate their attacks in the middle of the pitch, rather than on the wings. For their match strategy, GG-TEAM had decided to use their ability to counter-attack whenever possible. 24 minutes into the match and the home team took a 1 - 0 lead after breaking through on the left. The scorer for sharif was J. Canou. After 33 minutes, the away team failed to deal with a good exchange of passes on the right, and C. Rogers gave the sharif supporters even more to cheer about when he increased the lead to 2 - 0. With 34 minutes played, sharif's well-worked indirect free kick caused havoc in the penalty area, and when the ball eventually fell to G. Boissevain he gleefully slotted the ball home to make it 3 - 0. At this point, it was obvious that the players of sharif lowered the tempo and became more defensively oriented. J. Canou unleashed a swerving effort from the right that the visitors' keeper did well to tip wide. Halftime score was 3 - 0. Possession in this half belonged to sharif, who controlled the ball 70 percent of the time.

The GG-TEAM players listened closely to their manager, as he gave new tactical instructions for the team. The GG-TEAM coach was desperate to reverse his team's fortunes in the game, and ordered his team to change strategy. sharif had a good opportunity to attack on the wing, but remembered their instructions to go for middle attacks. sharif's F. Jiménez Yepes saw his fine effort strike the top of the bar following some good work up the middle by his teammates after 75 minutes. A counterattack by GG-TEAM after 76 minutes could have resulted in a goal, but E. Azadvari, coming in on the left, couldn't get the shot off. With 77 minutes played, sharif put themselves up 4 - 0 when the visiting defenders lost the ball to V. Laurenza, who came up from the left and proceeded to coolly round the keeper and knock the ball home. It was obvious that team sharif had instructions to attack in the middle instead of on the wings. With 85 minutes gone, a long pass from the defence of GG-TEAM resulted in a counterattack that set C. Ţăranu free through the middle, but the keeper made a spectacular diving save. sharif claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 71 percent.

C. Rogers performed admirably for sharif. G. Boissevain on the other hand, had a terrible day. Most important GG-TEAM player was C. Ţăranu. On the other hand, A. Pashanejad's play was disheartening. The match ends 4 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield inadequate (high) wretched (very high) 19 8 5/20 2/20
Right defence passable (low) inadequate (very low) 22 17 6/20 5/20
Central defence formidable (low) excellent (very low) 34 29 9/20 8/20
Left defence passable (very high) inadequate (high) 24 19 6/20 5/20
Right attack inadequate (high) poor (low) 19 10 5/20 3/20
Central attack solid (low) weak (high) 26 15 7/20 4/20
Left attack inadequate (very high) poor (low) 20 10 5/20 3/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence inadequate (high) inadequate (very low) 19 17 5/20 5/20
Attack inadequate (low) weak (very high) 18 16 5/20 4/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack in the Middle Counter-attacks
Tactic skill supernatural passable 14 6 14/20 6/20
 
Average midfield inadequate (high) wretched (very high) 19 8 5/20 2/20
Average defence solid (high) passable (very low) 27 21 7/20 6/20
Average attack passable (low) poor (very high) 22 12 6/20 3/20
Total average passable (high) weak (low) 23 14 6/20 4/20
 
 
Server 095