We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

Lulu 0 - 7 Carampangue (391246855)

It had rained all day, but 7231 hardy fans still made it out to Toto Fajira. Manolo Riera was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Qasim Manaf and Joakim Christiansson. Lulu had chosen a strategic 5-3-2 formation. They fielded: Sorre - Ötke, Godoy, Heimeran, Gundín, Navarro - Vargas, Buchmayr, Rivas - Reyes, Conde.

Carampangue started off with a 3-5-2 lineup. The following players took the field: Tang - Valek, Andreassen, Mac Donald - Codrescu, Ponseti, Naveda, Fernandes, Ciaurriz - Ceballos, Calzada.

Counter-attacking seemed to be the preferred strategy of Lulu. With 8 minutes played, the visitors broke through on the right after some poor defending. C. Calzada put the ball away for 0 - 1. R. Vargas, who often relies on his speed, had a rotten day on the drenched grass. The home crowd cheered when, after 25 minutes, S. Ceballos's charge up the middle resulted in the keeper making one of his best saves of the day. With 26 minutes played, a quick exchange of passes on the left wing freed P. Codrescu of Carampangue to slip through the defence and score another goal for the visitors. That made the score 0 - 2. 27 minutes in, Carampangue's R. Mac Donald received a yellow card for going into a challenge studs first. K. Andreassen came close to extending the visitors' lead when he found himself completely unmarked in front of the goal after a pass through the middle. He tried to lift the ball over E. Sorre but overcooked it and hit the bar instead. The opposing supporters gave the referee an earful when he only gave R. Naveda from Carampangue a yellow card after a mistimed challenge from behind 35 minutes into the game. That was far too lenient! R. Mac Donald increased the visitors' lead by putting a volley away after a pass from the right. 0 - 3. After several obvious shirt pulling incidents, V. Valek got himself booked. The manager of Carampangue was not happy. Halftime score was 0 - 3. Carampangue enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 75 percent of possession.

Lulu's counterattack was impressive and was only stopped by a shocking foul. Somehow, the referee's cards remained in his pocket - a terrible decision! S. Conde's resulting free kick was easily saved by the keeper. R. Vargas made a nice dash down the wing after 54 minutes, but was unable to get the cross into the box. A goal kick was awarded. The home crowd was not impressed when C. Calzada came in from the right, shooting hard to score after 58 minutes. Carampangue were now up 0 - 4. After this, you could see that the players of Carampangue were more interested in killing time than scoring more goals. After 63 minutes, a mistake by the home side's left defence allowed R. Ponseti to get through. He outclassed the home side's keeper, adding another goal for the visitors. 0 - 5. After 77 minutes, an incisive pass through the middle gave C. Calzada a chance to increase the lead for Carampangue, and he did not disappoint. The score was then 0 - 6. By then C. Calzada had scored three goals - a hat trick! With 84 minutes played, Carampangue put themselves up 0 - 7 after an attack from the right, caused by a defensive blunder. The scorer was C. Calzada. Carampangue had most of the ball, with 79 percent of possession.

The most dominating Lulu player was without a doubt J. Buchmayr. However, Y. Ötke made a disastrous appearance. Carampangue's top performer was clearly B. Fernandes. R. Naveda on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 0 - 7.

Rating details

Midfield wretched (high) inadequate (low) 7 18 2/20 5/20
Right defence weak (low) brilliant (high) 14 43 4/20 11/20
Central defence inadequate (high) outstanding (very high) 19 40 5/20 10/20
Left defence weak (high) inadequate (very high) 15 20 4/20 5/20
Right attack weak (very high) solid (low) 16 26 4/20 7/20
Central attack weak (very low) passable (low) 13 22 4/20 6/20
Left attack inadequate (high) passable (low) 19 22 5/20 6/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (very low) inadequate (very high) 13 20 4/20 5/20
Attack poor (very high) inadequate (very low) 12 17 3/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Counter-attacks Normal
Tactic skill excellent (no tactic) 8 (no tactic) 8/20
 
Average midfield wretched (high) inadequate (low) 7 18 2/20 5/20
Average defence weak (very high) formidable (high) 16 35 4/20 9/20
Average attack weak (very high) passable (high) 16 23 4/20 6/20
Total average weak (very low) solid (very low) 13 25 4/20 7/20
 
 
Server 096