We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 4/10 next 6/10  Hetaroi 2 - 3 PoToSpElAoS (392504707)

19429 spectators had found their way to luiscypher stadium, despite the heavy rain. Steve Ramondt was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Edilio Gilardoni and Heiner Tubeuf. Hetaroi decided to use a 4-3-3 set up. Lineup: Bulović - Pedersen, Peacock, Windschuegl, Bronsema - Kertz, Preisinger, van Pruissen - Lecciolino, Moreira Pinheiro, Ammosov.

PoToSpElAoS had chosen a strategic 5-3-2 formation. Starters: Valdés - Puelma, de Armas, Guerrero, Öğütveren, Herquiñigo - Nieto, Almeyda, Romanato - Mañeru, Stampoulis.

Hetaroi seemed to prefer attacking in the middle. Using their counter-attacking abilities was the strategy of choice for PoToSpElAoS. C. Guerrero received some harsh words from his coach after he acted foolishly 2 minutes into the match, probably out of lack of experience, and almost let an opponent score. Central attacks were the recipe of the day for Hetaroi, as they moved the ball from the wings to the middle with startling regularity. Hetaroi had to make a substitution after 31 minutes. R. Peacock limped off the field and was replaced by J. Arroyal. M. Bulović became the new Hetaroi captain. PoToSpElAoS took the lead after 32 minutes making the score 0 - 1. E. Stampoulis placed the ball out of reach for the home side's keeper after a fine move, coming in from the left. After 34 minutes, an incisive pass through the middle gave C. Guerrero a chance to increase the lead for PoToSpElAoS, and he did not disappoint. The score was then 0 - 2. Hetaroi players heard their coach's words ringing in their ears and steered their wing attacks to the middle instead. After 36 minutes, A. van Pruissen had a good opportunity to reduce the scoreline for Hetaroi with a chance created through the middle, but wasn't cool enough. The ball went miles over the bar. Had it not been for one of the home defenders, B. Nieto would have put PoToSpElAoS up another goal 37 minutes into the match with his audacious lob from the right wing. The referee showed Hetaroi's G. Lecciolino the yellow card after a particularly nasty challenge. The rain made it hard for players like J. Arroyal to show their technical control of the ball on this soggy day. PoToSpElAoS's counterattacks created a good chance for T. Romanato on the right after 41 minutes, but he could only look on with dismay as his strike rebounded off the crossbar. 0 - 2 was the score after the first half. Hetaroi claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 61 percent.

E. Ammosov charged down the left and looked sure to score for Hetaroi 61 minutes into the game, but his shot went just wide. The crowd groaned when D. Moreira Pinheiro, having maneuvered his way down the right, fired the ball just wide and missed a great opportunity to reduce the deficit for Hetaroi. PoToSpElAoS caught their opponents out with a clever counterattack down the right wing 73 minutes into the match. C. Guerrero was able to finish off the move - 0 - 3. Hetaroi's G. Lecciolino got the home crowd going when he finished off a left wing charge, reducing the away team's lead to 1 - 3. PoToSpElAoS's S. Almeyda refused to leave the field after injuring his achilles tendon after 76 minutes. The muddy pitch made the game a gritty affair, which seemed to suit C. Guerrero just fine. Hetaroi refused to be intimidated and, breaking through the middle, E. Ammosov managed to slip the ball home for 2 - 3. E. Pedersen slipped and slithered in the wet grass. His usual rapid runs were nowhere to be seen today. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by Hetaroi, with 66 percent of the ball.

The most dominating Hetaroi player was without a doubt E. Ammosov. J. Arroyal turned in a dismal performance, however. PoToSpElAoS's top performer was clearly C. Guerrero. On the other hand, F. Valdés's play was disheartening. The match ends 2 - 3.

Rating details

Midfield poor (low) wretched (high) 10 7 3/20 2/20
Right defence weak (low) excellent (very high) 14 32 4/20 8/20
Central defence passable (low) outstanding (low) 22 38 6/20 10/20
Left defence inadequate (low) solid (low) 18 26 5/20 7/20
Right attack weak (low) wretched (high) 14 7 4/20 2/20
Central attack passable (very high) weak (very low) 24 13 6/20 4/20
Left attack weak (low) solid (high) 14 27 4/20 7/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (very high) inadequate (very high) 16 20 4/20 5/20
Attack weak (low) inadequate (low) 14 18 4/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack in the Middle Counter-attacks
Tactic skill outstanding magnificent 10 12 10/20 12/20
 
Average midfield poor (low) wretched (high) 10 7 3/20 2/20
Average defence inadequate (low) excellent (very high) 18 32 5/20 8/20
Average attack inadequate (very low) weak (very high) 17 16 5/20 4/20
Total average weak (high) inadequate (low) 15 18 4/20 5/20
 
 
Server 095