We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 8/10 next 10/10  Seagulls 2 - 1 Gevelsberg (392716279)

The 584 fans in attendance at Neptuns Reich were roasting in the hot sun. Cornelis van Heulen was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Marco Amici and Ronnie Loschek. Seagulls decided to use a 3-4-3 set up. The following players had been chosen: Fornier - Ghviniashvili, Gutierrez, Airikka - Hägertorp, Wurzach, Jajić, Wacker - Boghină, Huhtala, Trippenbach.

Gevelsberg tactics involved an interesting 3-5-2 combination. They fielded: Wasserstern - Lamberty, James, Kruschik - Serrallonga, Ingelheim, Grygiel, Marzullo, Strallhofer - Lankes, Duville.

Gevelsberg were mostly trying to use their skill at attacking on the flanks. After 11 minutes of play, O. Trippenbach gave the home team a 1 - 0 lead after an attack coming in from the right. P. Fornier's name was chanted throughout the stadium after he made a fantastic save from H. Kruschik's shot from the left 14 minutes into the match. A foul called during a Seagulls counterattack resulted in a great chance to score, but O. Trippenbach's shot rattled off the post. Seagulls put in a good effort on the right, but N. Huhtala saw his volley fly wide of the mark 21 minutes into the game. Gevelsberg's P. Strallhofer was shown a yellow card for standing over the ball and blocking an opponent's quick free kick after 27 minutes. The visitors' equaliser seemed sure to come after 27 minutes, following a one on one situation around the left hand side of the goal area, but P. Fornier got the best of it, blocking the shot from H. Grygiel. It was obvious that Gevelsberg had instructions to attack on the wings instead of in the middle. D. Lankes came close to levelling the score 33 minutes into the game, as he was set up with a through ball coming in from the left, but his shot hit the post. With 34 minutes played, the visitors could have drawn level after P. Strallhofer came through the middle, but his kick went wide. The teams went for the halftime break at 1 - 0. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by Gevelsberg, with 54 percent of the ball.

With 50 minutes played, H. Grygiel came in from the right and could have evened the score, but the defenders successfully repelled the attack by Gevelsberg. Gevelsberg were close to putting the equaliser away after 51 minutes as the opposing defence lost control of the ball to D. Serrallonga in a scuffle towards the left of the goal, but in the end the ball was cleared over the dead ball line. A magnificent combination in the middle resulted in Seagulls's S. Jajić increasing the lead to 2 - 0. After 61 minutes of play, Gevelsberg's X. Marzullo unexpectedly struck an inside out ball from no angle at all and P. Duville slotted it into the net for 2 - 1. Gevelsberg claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 57 percent.

Seagulls's top performer was clearly O. Trippenbach. On the other hand, M. Wurzach's play was disheartening. The most dominating Gevelsberg player was without a doubt H. Kruschik. D. Lankes on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 2 - 1.

Rating details

Midfield poor (very low) poor (low) 9 10 3/20 3/20
Right defence inadequate (low) inadequate (very high) 18 20 5/20 5/20
Central defence inadequate (very low) inadequate (low) 17 18 5/20 5/20
Left defence inadequate (low) passable (very low) 18 21 5/20 6/20
Right attack passable (high) weak (high) 23 15 6/20 4/20
Central attack inadequate (very high) poor (very low) 20 9 5/20 3/20
Left attack solid (low) weak (very high) 26 16 7/20 4/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (high) weak (high) 15 15 4/20 4/20
Attack weak (high) weak (very high) 15 16 4/20 4/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Attack on wings
Tactic skill (no tactic) solid (no tactic) 7 7/20
 
Average midfield poor (very low) poor (low) 9 10 3/20 3/20
Average defence inadequate (low) inadequate (high) 18 19 5/20 5/20
Average attack passable (high) weak (very low) 23 13 6/20 4/20
Total average inadequate (very low) weak (low) 17 14 5/20 4/20
 
 
Server 095