We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 4/10 next 6/10  2008 0 - 6 Luuser (393184021)

Clouds darkened the skies at Kleelipark as 1613 spectators turned up for the match. Jonathan Larrain was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Stijn Herremans and Thierry Cheret. 2008 decided to use a 5-4-1 set up. The following players took the field: Lahmann - Reimers, Leonard, Mathieux, Fanelli, Cossu - Gnos, Pommeret, Hildner, Amador - Frencken.

Luuser had chosen a strategic 4-5-1 formation. The following players had been chosen: Tinits - Wyman, Bobel, de Vos, Vägine - Štěpánek, Pilfeldt, Hernández, Kaiklem, Carcova - Sarv.

It was an obvious ambition of Luuser to use their ability at attacking on the flanks. Slack defending gave 2008 a chance to take the lead with 24 minutes played, but F. Fanelli's cross from the left flank was fumbled in front of the goal and easily dealt with by the opposition. Luuser's M. Kaiklem was shown a yellow card after 29 minutes for slicing down an opponent. L. de Vos was the first to reach the corner kick, but his header was blocked by the keeper. However, Luuser's J. Štěpánek managed to get hold of the rebound and tucked the ball into the empty net. 0 - 1 Luuser came close to extending their lead as M. Bobel delivered a low effort on goal from the right after 37 minutes, but the angle was too narrow and the shot went harmlessly into the side netting. 37 minutes into the match, the speedy J. Štěpánek easily outpaced É. Cossu, chipped the keeper and made the score 0 - 2. The teams went for the halftime break at 0 - 2. Luuser had most of the ball, with 77 percent of possession.

After 54 minutes a well-practised indirect free kick routine by Luuser was easily anticipated by the defenders. The players forward were so well marked, they were left with few viable options. With 60 minutes played, Luuser put themselves up 0 - 3 after an attack from the right, caused by a defensive blunder. The scorer was G. Sarv. 68 minutes into the game, Luuser had difficulty finding their positions and their organisation dropped to inadequate. 76 minutes in, Luuser appeared unsure on how to play and their organisation was only weak. Some fine movement on the left led to a Luuser goal after 77 minutes, making it 0 - 4. A. Pilfeldt was noted down as the scorer. At this point, it was obvious that the players of Luuser lowered the tempo and became more defensively oriented. M. Kaiklem increased the visitors' lead by putting a volley away after a pass from the right. 0 - 5. The opposing supporters gave the referee an earful when he only gave S. Gnos from 2008 a yellow card after a mistimed challenge from behind 79 minutes into the game. That was far too lenient! 82 minutes into the match, the visitors put themselves ahead 0 - 6 as G. Sarv finished off an attack from the left with a spectacular scissors kick. Luuser claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 76 percent.

2008's best player was T. Frencken. However, A. Leonard made a disastrous appearance. The most dominating Luuser player was without a doubt A. Hernández. D. Wyman was a disappointment, however. The match ends 0 - 6.

Rating details

Midfield wretched (low) inadequate (low) 6 18 2/20 5/20
Right defence weak (low) inadequate (high) 14 19 4/20 5/20
Central defence inadequate (low) passable (very low) 18 21 5/20 6/20
Left defence weak (low) poor (very high) 14 12 4/20 3/20
Right attack weak (very low) excellent (very low) 13 29 4/20 8/20
Central attack wretched (very high) wretched (very high) 8 8 2/20 2/20
Left attack weak (low) inadequate (very high) 14 20 4/20 5/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (low) inadequate (very low) 14 17 4/20 5/20
Attack poor (high) weak (high) 11 15 3/20 4/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Attack on wings
Tactic skill (no tactic) brilliant (no tactic) 11 11/20
 
Average midfield wretched (low) inadequate (low) 6 18 2/20 5/20
Average defence weak (very high) inadequate (very low) 16 17 4/20 5/20
Average attack poor (very high) inadequate (high) 12 19 3/20 5/20
Total average poor (high) inadequate (low) 11 18 3/20 5/20
 
 
Server 096