We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 3/10 next 5/10  gk sk 4 - 0 Şapsığ (393224576)

Dark skies made the crowd of 819 at Kandaz-Allianz Arena a little nervous, but the rain held off. Stefan Grozdanov was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Ermanno Scardamaglio and Włodzimierz Marciniszyn. gk sk had chosen a strategic 5-4-1 formation. The following players took the field: Salkun - Sillicani, Vecchi, Carisch, Gaumont, Rec - Rasiha, Blahuš, Herdina, Jańczy - Duy Khanh.

Şapsığ tactics involved an interesting 4-4-2 combination. They fielded: Pejić - Altun, Kuthan, Caney, Uma - Conjaerts, Güneş, Çevikel, Campana - Chalkiotis, Popescu.

Şapsığ tried to focus their attacks down the middle. A questionable penalty 21 minutes in gave the home side the lead, 1 - 0. The visitors' goalie didn't stand a chance as M. Jańczy knocked the ball home. M. Vecchi increased the lead for gk sk to 2 - 0, getting a head onto a hooked ball from the right. The ball looked to have taken a deflection on the way in, but he's claiming it! Halftime score was 2 - 0. gk sk had most of the ball, with 64 percent of possession.

M. Jańczy struck a 30 metre free kick home 68 minutes into the match. 3 - 0 for the home team. J. Gaumont behaved like an inexperienced youth player after 83 minutes as he gave the ball away to G. Popescu. Lucky for him though, there was no goal. After 84 minutes, M. Jańczy put gk sk ahead 4 - 0 when he rose to head in a cross from the right wing. That made three goals for M. Jańczy and he was marked down for the hat trick. After this, you could see that the players of gk sk were more interested in killing time than scoring more goals. gk sk claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 69 percent.

U. Rasiha performed admirably for gk sk. On the other hand, K. Carisch's play was disheartening. Şapsığ's top performer was clearly L. Conjaerts. However, F. Çevikel made a disastrous appearance. The match ends 4 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield poor (low) wretched (low) 10 6 3/20 2/20
Right defence passable (high) weak (very high) 23 16 6/20 4/20
Central defence solid (low) inadequate (very high) 26 20 7/20 5/20
Left defence passable (low) weak (low) 22 14 6/20 4/20
Right attack weak (high) weak (very high) 15 16 4/20 4/20
Central attack wretched (high) weak (very low) 7 13 2/20 4/20
Left attack poor (low) wretched (high) 10 7 3/20 2/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (low) weak (low) 14 14 4/20 4/20
Attack poor (very high) weak (very high) 12 16 3/20 4/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Attack in the Middle
Tactic skill (no tactic) excellent (no tactic) 8 8/20
 
Average midfield poor (low) wretched (low) 10 6 3/20 2/20
Average defence passable (very high) inadequate (very low) 24 17 6/20 5/20
Average attack poor (high) poor (very high) 11 12 3/20 3/20
Total average weak (high) poor (very high) 15 12 4/20 3/20
 
 
Server 095