We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 1/10 next 3/10  Debloos 1 - 5 lechia (393992825)

It had rained all day, but 306 hardy fans still made it out to Stamford Bridge. Jack Faas was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Luis Ríos and Lars Tappy. Debloos decided to use a 4-5-1 set up. Lineup: Bodzioch - Ploteau, Laurendeau, Hoen, Krawczuk - Ziemnicki, Rochmiński, Waryszak, Nabais, Dębiak - Gohr.

lechia had chosen a strategic 3-5-2 formation. They fielded: Gianquitto - Hawkes, Ocampos, Zink - Seifert, Peszek, Casoni, Heine-Vāgners, Donaire - Voermans, Kącki.

Debloos were mostly trying to use their skill at attacking on the flanks. lechia preferred to finish off their attacks from a distance. After 28 minutes, lechia's G. Donaire made his way through the middle and nonchalantly placed the ball out of the keeper's reach, putting the visitors up 0 - 1. As the game started to slip away for Debloos, the manager decided to change the tactical approach. W. Hoen spent most of the time in a heap on the ground today, his normally rapid movement hindered by the slippery pitch. After 36 minutes, lechia sent a free kick in high over the penalty box. In what looked like a well-rehearsed move, the ball was headed backwards and reached J. Voermans, who had plenty of space to place a well aimed shot - 0 - 2. With 40 minutes played, the excellent ball from the wing by Debloos's A. Dębiak reached B. Gohr's head, and he is not one to miss such an opportunity - 1 - 2. A. Seifert of lechia took advantage of a mistake on the home side's right after 42 minutes which increased the away team's lead to 1 - 3. H. Peszek received a delicate pass through the home side's central defence after 43 minutes, and chipped it past the flailing keeper to score making it 1 - 4. The lechia fans went wild, whilst the home fans started to think about leaving early. The players of lechia now seemed to think the job was done and acted more defensively, just waiting for the ref to blow the final whistle. A misunderstanding between the visitors' keeper E. Gianquitto and his left defence could have resulted in a goal for Debloos, but A. Dębiak's finish was way too lame. The teams went for the halftime break at 1 - 4. Possession in this half belonged to lechia, who controlled the ball 52 percent of the time.

M. Ziemnicki was struggling to make the ball dance with his usual trickery and panache, and the opposing players had little trouble shutting him down in these muddy conditions. Against a lesser team, lechia could very well have succeeded with their smart indirect free kick routine after 61 minutes. A trio of passes took the ball all the way past the defenders, but by then the intended recipient was already blocked off and the keeper could make a leisurely save. With 67 minutes played, M. Kącki nearly put the visitors another one up as he broke through in the middle and fired from just outside the box, but his shot passed just over the bar. After 68 minutes, an incisive pass through the middle gave J. Voermans a chance to increase the lead for lechia, and he did not disappoint. The score was then 1 - 5. M. Ziemnicki tried to get a goal back for Debloos but despite all his hard work down the right, he just couldn't complete the move. lechia focused on finding shooting opportunities from distance and after 72 minutes M. Kącki fired off the big cannon, but the shot went sailing over the cross bar and into the car park. Some things can only be learned through experience, and J. Ploteau should take his lesson to heart after nearly gifting lechia a goal with 76 minutes of the match played. Debloos claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 52 percent.

The most dominating Debloos player was without a doubt M. Ziemnicki. On the other hand, C. Waryszak's play was disheartening. lechia's best player was M. Kącki. E. Gianquitto on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 1 - 5.

Rating details

Midfield poor (very low) poor (low) 9 10 3/20 3/20
Right defence weak (low) inadequate (high) 14 19 4/20 5/20
Central defence weak (very low) inadequate (high) 13 19 4/20 5/20
Left defence poor (very high) inadequate (low) 12 18 3/20 5/20
Right attack poor (high) inadequate (very low) 11 17 3/20 5/20
Central attack wretched (high) inadequate (very low) 7 17 2/20 5/20
Left attack weak (very low) weak (high) 13 15 4/20 4/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (high) inadequate (very low) 15 17 4/20 5/20
Attack poor (high) inadequate (very low) 11 17 3/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Long shots
Tactic skill excellent inadequate 8 5 8/20 5/20
 
Average midfield poor (very low) poor (low) 9 10 3/20 3/20
Average defence weak (very low) inadequate (high) 13 19 4/20 5/20
Average attack poor (low) weak (very high) 10 16 3/20 4/20
Total average poor (high) weak (high) 11 15 3/20 4/20
 
 
Server 096