We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 4/10 next 6/10  patetik 9 - 1 Orcas (394081663)

The weather was pretty good, and a crowd of 3001 had shown up at techno stadium for the match. Jannik Genin was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Andreas Supper and Jan Willem van Silfhout. patetik tactics involved an interesting 2-5-3 combination. The following players took the field: Hespital - Desplanques, Rossen - Hasselbalch, Kouadio, Laborie, Noah, Pascaud - Denisov, Hernani, Dettmar.

Orcas started off with a 4-4-2 lineup. They fielded: De Wilde - Van den Eynde, Caro, Carvalho, Van Den Eynden - Dong Ting, Verver, Vandewiele, Van Rompaey - Jovanović, Saint-Aimé.

Orcas seemed to prefer attacking in the middle. patetik took the lead 2 minutes in, as D. Denisov broke through on the left and put the 1 - 0 shot just beyond the reach of the outstretched keeper. A great save by keeper J. De Wilde after 10 minutes kept the visitors in the game after J. Hasselbalch struck from the left with a real cannonball. P. Saint-Aimé knocked one home from a counterattack down the right wing, making the score 1 - 1 after 11 minutes. The home side put themselves ahead 2 - 1 after 17 minutes courtesy of a breakthrough from M. Hernani, who scored with a stunning volley following a cross from the right wing. Things were going to get worse for the visitors. U. Rossen squirmed through their central defence after 26 minutes, increasing the lead to 3 - 1. After 28 minutes, there was a bit of a mixup on the field as patetik found themselves out of position and their organisation level dropped to inadequate. patetik increased the lead as J. Pascaud struck to make the score 4 - 1 after an attack from the left left him unmarked in front of the keeper. 4 - 1 was the halftime score. patetik enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 74 percent of possession.

The coach gave his players an extra tactical briefing during the break, and after that patetik had solid organisation. The home side's A. Kouadio came close to extending the lead 48 minutes into the game. His shot came in from the right hand side but J. De Wilde managed to save it with an unbelievable reaction stop. 49 minutes into the game, patetik seemed a little tentative in their play as their organization fell to inadequate. D. Caro's inexperience was obvious when his continual hesitation to put in a tackle allowed K. Dettmar plenty of time to pick an unguarded area of the goal for his shot, marking one for patetik. 5 - 1. The home side's J. Pascaud curled a free kick home after 52 minutes, putting patetik ahead 6 - 1. By now, the players in patetik felt that victory was guaranteed and began to play it safe, focusing on defence and not risking too much going forward. After 55 minutes, U. Rossen put patetik ahead 7 - 1 when he rose to head in a cross from the right wing. After 76 minutes, the away team failed to deal with a good exchange of passes on the right, and J. Hasselbalch gave the patetik supporters even more to cheer about when he increased the lead to 8 - 1. 80 minutes into the match, the visitors' central line of defence had to look on as M. Hernani broke through, making the score 9 - 1 for patetik. 81 minutes into the game, patetik had difficulty finding their positions and their organisation dropped to poor. patetik had most of the ball, with 75 percent of possession.

K. Dettmar performed admirably for patetik. M. Hernani turned in a dismal performance, however. Most important Orcas player was P. Saint-Aimé. However, J. De Wilde made a disastrous appearance. The match ends 9 - 1.

Rating details

Midfield solid (very low) wretched (very high) 25 8 7/20 2/20
Right defence weak (very high) wretched (very high) 16 8 4/20 2/20
Central defence passable (very low) weak (high) 21 15 6/20 4/20
Left defence inadequate (very high) poor (high) 20 11 5/20 3/20
Right attack solid (high) poor (high) 27 11 7/20 3/20
Central attack passable (very high) passable (very low) 24 21 6/20 6/20
Left attack inadequate (low) weak (very high) 18 16 5/20 4/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence inadequate (very high) weak (very high) 20 16 5/20 4/20
Attack passable (low) weak (low) 22 14 6/20 4/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Attack in the Middle
Tactic skill (no tactic) outstanding (no tactic) 10 10/20
 
Average midfield solid (very low) wretched (very high) 25 8 7/20 2/20
Average defence inadequate (high) poor (high) 19 11 5/20 3/20
Average attack passable (high) weak (very high) 23 16 6/20 4/20
Total average passable (low) poor (very high) 22 12 6/20 3/20
 
 
Server 096