We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.
previous 10/10 next 2/10 

Forestry 3 - 1 Bolso

Weather conditions were fairly good for football, and Forestry Arena saw a crowd turnout of 2156. Danny de Gooijer was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Alberto Moreira and Heri Ellindsson. Forestry started off with a 3-5-2 lineup. Lineup: Hürlimann - Caragaţă, De Sloover, Szűcs - Baba, Pădurariu, Asil, Harabagiu, Gangling - Şofron, Paulescu.

Bolso tactics involved an interesting 3-4-3 combination. The following players had been chosen: Verano - Fornaro, Laursen, Del Río Secco - Clara, Cruz, Moreira, Mariani - Souto, Pintado, Delamare.

P. Gangling gave Forestry the lead as he successfully challenged the guests' central defenders, then slotted the ball into the bottom corner, giving the keeper no chance. 1 - 0 After several obvious shirt pulling incidents, E. Souto got himself booked. The manager of Bolso was not happy. Halftime score was 1 - 0. Forestry had most of the ball, with 64 percent of possession.

After 54 minutes, A. Paulescu put Forestry ahead 2 - 0 when he rose to head in a cross from the right wing. 71 minutes into the match, the speedy P. Delamare easily outpaced W. De Sloover, chipped the keeper and made the score 2 - 1. G. Şofron had a fantastic opportunity to put Forestry up another goal 73 minutes into the match, but he fired just over the crossbar. Coming from the right, P. Gangling almost managed to score another goal for Forestry, but his header was tipped over the bar by the visitors' keeper. Coming through the middle C. Fornaro almost scored the equaliser for Bolso after 78 minutes, but L. Hürlimann made an excellent save, tipping the awkwardly curled shot past the post. Forestry managed to extend their lead to 3 - 1 when A. Paulescu cut in neatly from the left side and struck a fine shot past the away team's goalkeeper. After this, you could see that the players of Forestry were more interested in killing time than scoring more goals. Forestry enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 66 percent of possession.

Forestry's top performer was clearly L. Harabagiu. M. Caragaţă on the other hand, had a terrible day. The most dominating Bolso player was without a doubt P. Delamare. On the other hand, I. Mariani's play was disheartening. The match ends 3 - 1.

Rating details

Midfield passable (very low) poor (very high) 21 12 6/20 3/20
Right defence passable (low) poor (very high) 22 12 6/20 3/20
Central defence passable (high) passable (very high) 23 24 6/20 6/20
Left defence solid (very low) weak (low) 25 14 7/20 4/20
Right attack poor (high) poor (very high) 11 12 3/20 3/20
Central attack poor (high) solid (low) 11 26 3/20 7/20
Left attack weak (high) inadequate (very low) 15 17 4/20 5/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (very high) inadequate (very low) 16 17 4/20 5/20
Attack weak (very low) inadequate (very low) 13 17 4/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)
 

Highlights

1 - 0  P. Gangling 15'
2 - 0  A. Paulescu 54'
2 - 1  P. Delamare 71'
3 - 1  A. Paulescu 80'
1 booking accumulated E. Souto 42'

Possession

64%
36%
66%
34%
««
Average
0
5
10
15
1 - 0
20
25
30
35
40
Yellow card
45
50
2 - 0
55
60
65
70
2 - 1
75
80
3 - 1
Pullback
85
90
»»

Rating details

Show all graphs

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence weak (very high) inadequate (very low) 16 17 4/20 5/20
Attack weak (very low) inadequate (very low) 13 17 4/20 5/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)

Average ratings

Total player experience weak (very low) wretched (very high) 13 8 4/20 2/20
Average midfield passable (very low) poor (very high) 21 12 6/20 3/20
Average defence passable (high) inadequate (very low) 23 17 6/20 5/20
Average attack poor (very high) inadequate (low) 12 18 3/20 5/20
Total average inadequate (high) weak (very high) 19 16 5/20 4/20

Lineup




 
 
Server 096