végrehajtók 4 - 0 Juris (61484748)

4426 punters turned up at Dózsa György út, and despite threatening clouds on the horizon, no rain came. Quintin Dantz was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Rogério Ribeiro and Christophe Léger. végrehajtók had chosen a strategic 3-5-2 formation. The following players had been chosen: Traverso - Bakos, Lovász, Telek - Canío, Kámory, Kertels, Avital, Willems - Ciołkiewicz, Bánk.

Juris had chosen a strategic 4-4-2 formation. The following players had been chosen: Nagy - Rózsa, Mészöly, Somlyódy, Kőrösi - Návay, Birkás, Szücs, Gyepes - Máté, Dibernárdó.

végrehajtók seemed to prefer attacking in the middle. végrehajtók broke through on the left 3 minutes into the game, with Z. Kámory firing in from an acute angle to give the home side a 1 - 0 lead. végrehajtók increased the lead as J. Willems struck to make the score 2 - 0 after an attack from the left left him unmarked in front of the keeper. J. Canío should probably have put his team up another goal after 10 minutes, but some great goalkeeping by M. Nagy kept the visitors in the game. 11 minutes into the match, the visitors' central line of defence had to look on as J. Willems broke through, making the score 3 - 0 for végrehajtók. By now, the players in végrehajtók felt that victory was guaranteed and began to play it safe, focusing on defence and not risking too much going forward. The teams went for the halftime break at 3 - 0. végrehajtók claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 79 percent.

The referee showed Juris's B. Rózsa the yellow card after a particularly nasty challenge. Coming from the right, Z. Kámory almost managed to score another goal for végrehajtók, but his header was tipped over the bar by the visitors' keeper. Things were going to get worse for the visitors. S. Ciołkiewicz squirmed through their central defence after 74 minutes, increasing the lead to 4 - 0. Z. Kámory of végrehajtók received a yellow card after 82 minutes for unsportsmanlike behaviour. Z. Kámory received some harsh words from his coach after he acted foolishly 86 minutes into the match, probably out of lack of experience, and almost let an opponent score. végrehajtók claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 81 percent.

The most dominating végrehajtók player was without a doubt S. Telek. M. Traverso was a disappointment, however. Most important Juris player was Á. Szücs. I. Mészöly on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 4 - 0.