Mohikaani 0 - 0 Kyto
(369404057)

12-05-2012 20.00
It was an exceptionally sunny day for the crowd of 53056 that came out to
Mohikaanin telttakylä.
Pedro Guillén was the appointed referee with assistance provided by
Federico Contini and
Schorsch Schaechtelin.
Mohikaani had chosen a strategic 3-5-2 formation.
The following players took the field: Kroužek - Jukāns, Litmanen, Skaarup - Castrillón, Jonasson, Ricaldi, 安源 (Anyuan) , Lautamies - Loridan, Behndy.
Kyto started off with a 4-5-1 lineup.
They fielded: Nurmela - Heirman, Vainionpää, Blomme, Guevara - Coppens, Tiitta, Hansson, Savioja, Wekking - Bukin.
Counter-attacking seemed to be the preferred strategy of Kyto.
Mohikaani's
J. Castrillón was shown a yellow card after 13 minutes for slicing down an opponent.
Some great play up the middle by Mohikaani led to a chance for
T. Skaarup to score after 22 minutes, but the shot hit the crossbar.
At 23 minutes played,
B. Loridan came in from the right with the intention of giving Mohikaani the lead, but his rocket of a shot rattled the crossbar.
After a fine move down the middle
B. Loridan nearly gave the home side a goal after 34 minutes. However the finishing shot went just wide.
0 - 0 was the halftime score.
Mohikaani claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 70 percent.
Usually a powerful player on the field,
P. Hansson looked kind of pale and tired under the hot sun.
Mohikaani had a great opportunity to score following a counterattack after 62 minutes, but
N. Behndy's shot from the left sailed high over the bar.
The intense heat forced
B. Blomme into making some errors because he couldn't seem to keep up with the others.
Making his way up the middle 78 minutes into the match,
J. Castrillón almost managed to squeeze a goal past the visitors' keeper, but the alert
J. Nurmela blocked it to keep the score level.
N. Behndy's technique was perfect on this sunny day and led to some breathtaking tricks that bamboozled the defence.
Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by Mohikaani, with 71 percent of the ball.
The most dominating Mohikaani player was without a doubt
N. Behndy.
A. Lautamies on the other hand, had a terrible day.
Most important Kyto player was
G. Coppens.
B. Blomme turned in a dismal performance, however.
The match ends 0 - 0.
Rating details
|
|
|
| Midfield |
47 |
20 |
 |
 |
| Right defence |
59 |
57 |
 |
 |
| Central defence |
38 |
62 |
 |
 |
| Left defence |
35 |
43 |
 |
 |
| Right attack |
49 |
50 |
 |
 |
| Central attack |
33 |
17 |
 |
 |
| Left attack |
22 |
20 |
 |
 |
| |
| Indirect set pieces |
| Defence |
34 |
27 |
 |
 |
| Attack |
25 |
23 |
 |
 |
| |
| Team attitude |
(Hidden) |
(Hidden) |
| Tactic |
Normal |
Counter-attacks |
| Tactic skill |
(no tactic) |
10 |
|
 |
| |
| Average midfield |
47 |
20 |
 |
 |
| Average defence |
44 |
54 |
 |
 |
| Average attack |
34 |
29 |
 |
 |
| Total average |
42 |
34 |
 |
 |