purmerend 1 - 2 rottweilers
(390349908)

15-07-2012 21.00
Weather conditions were fairly good for football, and
de ring saw a crowd turnout of 14100.
Matias Hatunen was the appointed referee with assistance provided by
Claudio Piccioni and
Nicola Viggiani.
purmerend decided to use a 4-5-1 set up.
Lineup: Yngvesson - Ciubotaru, Neves, Lindhstad, Kuşcu - Zynda, Pruijssers, Castellví, Zubía, Matsson - Dalmolen.
rottweilers started off with a 5-3-2 lineup.
The following players took the field: Piazzese - Escales, Porquet, Dymalski, Moreolo, Narojczyk - Évain, Ranger, Vahedian - van Diepen, Bruhn.
The strategy for purmerend was to use their ability to press.
purmerend pressed their opponents, causing the game to be a bit of a stalemate at times.
rottweilers had to make a substitution after 8 minutes.
S. Escales limped off the field and was replaced by
E. Joosse.
After 17 minutes, rottweilers's
A. Vahedian made his way through the middle and nonchalantly placed the ball out of the keeper's reach, putting the visitors up 0 - 1.
After 19 minutes of play, purmerend's
İ. Kuşcu unexpectedly struck an inside out ball from no angle at all and
L. Dalmolen slotted it into the net for 1 - 1.
W. Moreolo of rottweilers was booked for kicking the ball away after the whistle.
rottweilers's
A. Vahedian could have put the guests one up after 38 minutes after chasing a through ball from the right, but
G. Yngvesson was as fast as a snake, grabbing the ball from under his nose.
39 minutes into the game, purmerend had difficulty finding their positions and their organisation dropped to
solid.
G. Ranger would have preferred to play on, but his coach decided otherwise.
A. Gangemi entered the game for rottweilers as the match clock showed 40 minutes.
1 - 1 was the halftime score.
purmerend claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 59 percent.
The coach gave his players an extra tactical briefing during the break, and after that purmerend had
solid organisation.
This was a good period for the visitors, with several opportunities to take the lead, particularly when
N. Bruhn slipped through the defence on the right to come up alone against
G. Yngvesson, but the home side's keeper showed his lightning reflexes.
B. van Diepen showed why he is feared on the counterattack, breaking through in the middle and scoring for rottweilers after 62 minutes to make the score 1 - 2.
Content with how the game was proceeding, the rottweilers coach let
N. Caelders replace
L. Dymalski after 70 minutes.
After a short break after 70 minutes, rottweilers seemed to change their tactical approach a bit.
In the lead, rottweilers adjusted their style of play with 70 minutes gone.
After 70 minutes, the rottweilers players received new instructions from their manager on how to keep in control of the game.
rottweilers had no available replacements when
W. Moreolo had to leave the game after 72 minutes because of a pulled tendon, leaving the team a man short.
73 minutes into the game, purmerend seemed a little tentative in their play as their organization fell to
passable.
After 81 minutes, there was a bit of a mixup on the field as purmerend found themselves out of position and their organisation level dropped to
inadequate.
purmerend enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 60 percent of possession.
Most important purmerend player was
M. Zubía.
On the other hand,
İ. Kuşcu's play was disheartening.
N. Bruhn performed admirably for rottweilers.
However,
E. Joosse made a disastrous appearance.
The match ends 1 - 2.
Rating details
|
|
|
| Midfield |
15 |
10 |
 |
 |
| Right defence |
34 |
26 |
 |
 |
| Central defence |
34 |
41 |
 |
 |
| Left defence |
29 |
29 |
 |
 |
| Right attack |
18 |
17 |
 |
 |
| Central attack |
12 |
29 |
 |
 |
| Left attack |
22 |
15 |
 |
 |
| |
| Indirect set pieces |
| Defence |
21 |
21 |
 |
 |
| Attack |
20 |
20 |
 |
 |
| |
| Team attitude |
(Hidden) |
(Hidden) |
| Tactic |
Pressing |
Normal |
| Tactic skill |
6 |
(no tactic) |
 |
|
| |
| Average midfield |
15 |
10 |
 |
 |
| Average defence |
33 |
32 |
 |
 |
| Average attack |
18 |
20 |
 |
 |
| Total average |
22 |
21 |
 |
 |