We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

EGL 1 - 2 Telinja

Due to the fairly good weather for football today, 280 spectators have come down to Eagles mfc. The coach fielded the following talents: Arbunea - Stănculescu, Kelemen, Luţan - Pilár, Ţugulea, Gârniceanu, Gulyás, Zetelaki - Bashmakov, Comiati.

The picks for today were: Stankoski - Kanevche, Stojmenovski, Shoshi, Nikiforovski - Velkovski, Naumoski, Vaskov, Cvetkoski, Nika - Batkovski.

Eagles mfc started the game in a 3-5-2 formation, whereas Veles City Juniors lined up in a 4-5-1 formation. Telinja appeared uncertain how to play and their organisation was only passable. Arjan Nika of Telinja had sent in many fine crosses from the wing and eventually one was taken advantage of, as Branimir Cvetkoski chested it down and smashed it home to make the score 0 - 1. Following a nasty collision in the 35, Telinja's Zhare Vaskov complained of a damaged shoulder. He was advised against continuing the game. Oltian Livadhi tried to hide a smile as he entered the field. He had not expected to get a chance this day. Telinja did not seem very confident about what to do on the pitch, the organisation level having broken down to weak. Some fine maneuvering on the left led to a goal for the young Telinja side after 42 minutes, making it 0 - 2. The referee announced Elis Shoshi as the scorer. At the halftime break, the score was 0 - 2. This half the EGL boys hung on to the ball, with 53 percent of possession.

The boys of Telinja were eager to get some feedback from their coach. His tactical review helped raise the team organisation to passable. Given a free kick in a difficult position after 47 minutes, EGL tried a variation that they had practised in training. The kick was sent into the area just in front of the keeper. However, the defence were on their toes and allowed no space for a finish. Did someone forget the pre-match briefing today? The Telinja lads didn't seem to have a clue what to do, and their organisation level dropped to inadequate. Telinja had been told to go on the counterattack now and then, but when they did, Risto Naumoski's shot sailed wide on the right. EGL's Cătălin Gârniceanu was happy to show off his talents to the coach, as he broke through on the left wing and reduced the away team's lead to 1 - 2. A long pass from the defence of EGL resulted in a counterattack that set Vilmos Zetelaki free of the last defender, but the keeper made a spectacular diving save. The match ends 1 - 2. EGL didn't seem to want to give the ball away in this half, which resulted in 53 percent of the possession.

The spectators agreed that the most impressive boy in EGL today had been Dan Arbunea. Mátyás Pilár needs a lot of extra training, however. Ivan Stojmenovski performed especially well for Telinja - this one could be a candidate for the senior squad one day. Danko Stankoski left the field with tears in his eyes, knowing he had been the worst player on his team.

Rating details

Midfield poor (high) poor (low) 11 10 3/20 3/20
Right defence passable (very low) weak (low) 21 14 6/20 4/20
Central defence excellent (high) excellent (high) 31 31 8/20 8/20
Left defence solid (low) passable (high) 26 23 7/20 6/20
Right attack wretched (low) wretched (high) 6 7 2/20 2/20
Central attack weak (very low) wretched (very high) 13 8 4/20 2/20
Left attack weak (very low) poor (low) 13 10 4/20 3/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence solid (very low) inadequate (very high) 25 20 7/20 5/20
Attack inadequate (low) inadequate (very high) 18 20 5/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)
 

Highlights

0 - 1  Branimir Cvetkoski 33'
0 - 2  Elis Shoshi 42'
1 - 2  Cătălin Gârniceanu 78'
Zhare Vaskov 35'
Substitution Out Zhare Vaskov
In Oltian Livadhi
35'

Possession

53%
47%
53%
47%

Chance distribution

Home Away
8 7

2 Left attack 2
5 Central attack 3
0 Right attack 1
1 Other 0
0 Special events 1

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence solid (very low) inadequate (very high) 25 20 7/20 5/20
Attack inadequate (low) inadequate (very high) 18 20 5/20 5/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)

Average ratings

Total player experience disastrous (very high) disastrous (low) 4 2 1/20 1/20
Average midfield poor (high) poor (low) 11 10 3/20 3/20
Average defence solid (low) passable (high) 26 23 7/20 6/20
Average attack poor (high) wretched (very high) 11 8 3/20 2/20
Total average weak (very high) weak (low) 16 14 4/20 4/20
The youth player ratings presented here show ratings as they were at the end of the match.

Lineup




 
 
Rate this page
Server 096