We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

viola 0 - 1 Veles

A group of 170 people showed up at arena 76, and despite threatening clouds on the horizon, no rain came. The boys who got to play today were: Belkó - Takács, Koska, Sipőcz, Mikuli, Nedyalkov - Titz, Balla, Szilágyi, Zsíros, Petőfi -.

The lucky starting players: Kjumbev - Gileski, Trajchov, Krstev, Tasevski - Zajkov, Zhupanoski, Stefkovski, Kicevski - Mirchevski, Postolovski.

fiorentina junior 1 started the game in a 5-5-0 formation, whereas Mladinski lined up in a 4-4-2 formation. Veles showed off their creative tactics. With 12 minutes played, Aco Zhupanoski looked all grown up as he hit a powerful shot at goal from the middle of the D, missing it by an inch. After 13 minutes, Richárd Petőfi of viola fell dramatically just outside the penalty area. However, the referee was not impressed by the young lad's acting skills and booked him for diving. 28 minutes into the game, Konstantin Postolovski had a great chance to put his team ahead, but his inept kick from the left went wide. Veles did not seem very confident about what to do on the pitch, the organisation level having broken down to passable. After 31 minutes, Veles scored as Ivo Zajkov's dangerous low cross was cleverly tucked in at the near post by Konstantin Postolovski. 0 - 1. The coach of Veles was embarrassed to see his players fail the tactical setup. Many played out of position and the organisation level of the team dropped to inadequate. Veles appeared uncertain how to play and their organisation was only weak. The referee confirmed the score as 0 - 1 when he signalled for the halftime break. viola, bringing their ball possession to 55 percent, seemed most ambitious today.

After handing out some oranges, Veles's coach repeated his tactical instructions to the team. The boys finally got it, and were back at solid organisation when the whistle blew again. Lacking experience with the current tactics, the players of Veles kept running into each other on the pitch. They only managed a inadequate level of organisation. The match ends 0 - 1. In this half viola were the most energetic, keeping the ball to themselves for 55 percent of the time.

The viola players gave Richárd Petőfi a group hug after the game, claiming he'd been "really great". Zsigmond Koska showed he still has a lot to learn. The coach of Veles was especially pleased with Konstantin Postolovski after the game. Blaze Trajchov left the field with tears in his eyes, knowing he had been the worst player on his team.

Rating details

Midfield weak (very high) weak (very low) 16 13 4/20 4/20
Right defence excellent (very high) inadequate (very low) 32 17 8/20 5/20
Central defence formidable (high) excellent (high) 35 31 9/20 8/20
Left defence formidable (very low) excellent (very high) 33 32 9/20 8/20
Right attack poor (very low) inadequate (high) 9 19 3/20 5/20
Central attack wretched (high) solid (very high) 7 28 2/20 7/20
Left attack weak (low) inadequate (high) 14 19 4/20 5/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence passable (low) solid (high) 22 27 6/20 7/20
Attack inadequate (low) solid (very low) 18 25 5/20 7/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Play creatively
Tactic skill (no tactic) wretched (no tactic) 2 2/20
 

Highlights

0 - 1  Konstantin Postolovski 31'
Richárd Petőfi 13'

Possession

55%
45%
55%
45%

Chance distribution

Home Away
7 3

1 Left attack 1
2 Central attack 1
2 Right attack 0
2 Other 0
0 Special events 1

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence passable (low) solid (high) 22 27 6/20 7/20
Attack inadequate (low) solid (very low) 18 25 5/20 7/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Play creatively
Tactic skill (no tactic) wretched (no tactic) 2 2/20

Average ratings

Total player experience disastrous (high) disastrous (low) 3 2 1/20 1/20
Average midfield weak (very high) weak (very low) 16 13 4/20 4/20
Average defence formidable (very low) solid (high) 33 27 9/20 7/20
Average attack poor (low) passable (low) 10 22 3/20 6/20
Total average inadequate (very high) passable (very low) 20 21 5/20 6/20
The youth player ratings presented here show ratings as they were at the end of the match.

Lineup




 
 
Rate this page
Server 095