We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

kanencin 5 - 1 FCW

Weather conditions were pretty good for football, and the lads were happy to see 291 people gathered to see their game at lopate arena. The coach fielded the following talents: Lako - Efremov, Emini - Garevski, Shulevski, Milosev, Bileski, Danilovski - Eftimov, Başkan, Caneski.

The picks for today were: Kruitwagen - van Druten, Falix, Makkes, Moerenhout - van Keeken, Bax, van Landschot, Pool - Axwijk, Birnie.

dilajli started the game in a 2-5-3 formation, whereas FC Fox Camp Welpen lined up in a 4-4-2 formation. kanencin would use their insights from a recent counterattack practice session in today's game. The visitors' central defenders should have stopped Leo Caneski, but they were naive in their efforts and let him slip through. The goal put kanencin into the lead, it was a low shot and the goalkeeper couldn't reach it. 1 - 0! 14 minutes into the game, kanencin scored again. Mirko Eftimov had picked up a stray ball, entered the box from the left, and then coolly rounded the goalkeeper for the 2 - 0 goal. kanencin's Mende Milosev was the happiest boy in town after the 3 - 0 goal, having seen his shot go between the legs of the advancing goalkeeper and into the net. The assist had come in from a mate out on the right wing. FCW breathed new life into the game when the opposition's right defence lacked in concentration after 30 minutes. Gur Lako was awake though and made it first to the loose ball just in front of Niels Birnie's feet. The 4 - 0 goal came 37 minutes into the game, on a penalty kick for kanencin. Mende Milosev anticipated where the keeper was heading, and placed the ball in the other corner. 4 - 0 was the score after the first half. In this half kanencin were the most energetic, keeping the ball to themselves for 65 percent of the time.

After 49 minutes of the match had been played, the visitors defenders misjudged the movements of kanencin's Goce Danilovski through the middle, leaving him one on one with the keeper. He pulled the trigger and the score was 5 - 0. Tomorr Emini should probably have put his team up another goal after 70 minutes, but Orlando Kruitwagen made a confident save and kept the visitors in the game. The guests got an opportunity to reduce the score after 74 minutes. Jory Axwijk was entrusted with the penalty kick, and he was quite relieved to place it beyond the keeper for 5 - 1. Mirko Eftimov could have put kanencin up one more, but he got stuck on his way towards the goal from the left after 75 minutes. The match ends 5 - 1. kanencin didn't seem to want to give the ball away in this half, which resulted in 65 percent of the possession.

The coach of kanencin was especially pleased with Leo Caneski after the game. On the other hand, Gur Lako's performance hadn't been very good at all. The FCW players gave Sandro Moerenhout a group hug after the game, claiming he'd been "really great". Orlando Kruitwagen needs a lot of extra training, however.

Rating details

Midfield weak (low) wretched (very high) 14 8 4/20 2/20
Right defence poor (high) inadequate (very high) 11 20 3/20 5/20
Central defence passable (low) inadequate (high) 22 19 6/20 5/20
Left defence weak (very low) inadequate (very high) 13 20 4/20 5/20
Right attack inadequate (low) weak (very low) 18 13 5/20 4/20
Central attack passable (high) weak (high) 23 15 6/20 4/20
Left attack inadequate (very high) weak (high) 20 15 5/20 4/20
Indirect set pieces
Defence inadequate (low) weak (high) 18 15 5/20 4/20
Attack passable (low) weak (high) 22 15 6/20 4/20
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Counter-attacks Normal
Tactic skill poor (no tactic) 3 (no tactic) 3/20


1 - 0  Leo Caneski 5'
2 - 0  Mirko Eftimov 14'
3 - 0  Mende Milosev 24'
4 - 0  Mende Milosev 37'
5 - 0  Goce Danilovski 49'
5 - 1  Jory Axwijk 74'



Chance distribution

Home Away
8 2

2 Left attack 1
3 Central attack 0
2 Right attack 0
1 Other 1
0 Special events 0

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence inadequate (low) weak (high) 18 15 5/20 4/20
Attack passable (low) weak (high) 22 15 6/20 4/20


Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Counter-attacks Normal
Tactic skill poor (no tactic) 3 (no tactic) 3/20

Average ratings

Total player experience disastrous (low) disastrous (high) 2 3 1/20 1/20
Average midfield weak (low) wretched (very high) 14 8 4/20 2/20
Average defence weak (high) inadequate (very high) 15 20 4/20 5/20
Average attack inadequate (very high) weak (low) 20 14 5/20 4/20
Total average weak (very high) weak (low) 16 14 5/20 4/20
The youth player ratings presented here show ratings as they were at the end of the match.


Rate this page
Server 095