We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

LIPPO 2 - 6 PaTe

1070 punters turned up at Sointulan Wembley, and despite threatening clouds on the horizon, no rain came. was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Kari Sarviluoma and . A 4-5-1 alignment was the formation of choice for LIPPO. The following players had been chosen: Vilander - Pitkäjärvi, Hanhineva, Hietanen, Räihä - Valtamo, Valanta, Torniainen, Vasankari, Pussinen - Kanyó.

PaTe decided to use a 5-4-1 set up. They fielded: Sladić - Gúlúbov, Lyysaari, Razzi, Kolmonen, Eloregui - Leiva, Claydon, Vatsar, Küstennebel - Zdrot.

LIPPO were mostly trying to use their solid skill at attacking on the flanks. It was an obvious ambition of PaTe to use their solid ability at attacking on the flanks. The most controversial moment of the game was likely the penalty given after 10 minutes. PaTe's Patrick Claydon kept his concentration, despite the upset crowd, and calmly put the ball past the keeper to make the score 0 - 1. 21 minutes into the game, Wacław Zdrot finished off a PaTe left wing counterattack, making the score 0 - 2. A drive down the left side allowed Patrick Claydon to get in close and score another goal for PaTe after 25 minutes, taking the score to 0 - 3. PaTe had to make a substitution after 29 minutes. Marcos Leiva limped off the field and was replaced by Masaya Tsukahara. The home crowd was not impressed when Johannes Lyysaari came in from the right, shooting hard to score after 32 minutes. PaTe were now up 0 - 4. By now, the players in PaTe felt that victory was guaranteed and began to play it safe, focusing on defence and not risking too much going forward. 35 minutes into the game LIPPO broke through on the left wing and Lauri Valtamo managed to reduce the lead to 1 - 4. 36 minutes into the game, PaTe worked the left side industriously creating several opportunities to add to their lead, but just couldn't apply the finishing touch. LIPPO's Jouni Hietanen was shown a yellow card for standing over the ball and blocking an opponent's quick free kick after 41 minutes. 43 minutes into the game a free kick by Patrick Claydon found its way through the home side's poorly assembled defensive formation, making PaTe's lead 1 - 5. This third goal completed a hattrick for Patrick Claydon. The teams went for the halftime break at 1 - 5. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by PaTe, with 51 percent of the ball.

With 46 minutes played, the LIPPO coach decided a substitution may help turn the game around. Joona Witikkala came on, Antti Torniainen had to leave the fray. LIPPO needed a fresh pair of legs on the field, and after 50 minutes Henri Hanhineva made way for Diego Steinhard. The LIPPO captaincy was handed to Diego Steinhard. With a penalty awarded after 74 minutes, LIPPO's Lajos Kanyó placed the ball low and to the keeper's right, impossible to block. 2 - 5. Although the whole team were struggling to impress, LIPPO's Lauri Valtamo was singled out as being the problem as he was called off the pitch after 79 minutes. Eskild Henze was given a chance to change things around. After 84 minutes, there was a bit of a mixup on the field as LIPPO found themselves out of position and their organisation level dropped to inadequate. Juha Vilander got a fingertip on Bob Küstennebel's shot from the left 85 minutes in, and managed to keep the visitors from going up another goal. The bicycle kick from Bob Küstennebel would have been the Goal of the Year for PaTe, had it not hit the post. The visitors added to their lead 89 minutes into the game, after a sensational penalty kick by PaTe's Patrick Claydon slid just past the home keeper. 2 - 6. Possession in this half belonged to PaTe, who controlled the ball 57 percent of the time.

The most dominating LIPPO player was without a doubt Eskild Henze. Jere Pitkäjärvi turned in a dismal performance, however. PaTe's top performer was clearly Patrick Claydon. On the other hand, Svetozar Sladić's play was disheartening. The match ends 2 - 6.

Rating details

Midfield weak (high) weak (very low) 15 13 4/20 4/20
Right defence weak (very low) formidable (very high) 13 36 4/20 9/20
Central defence weak (very low) solid (high) 13 27 4/20 7/20
Left defence poor (high) solid (very high) 11 28 3/20 7/20
Right attack inadequate (high) inadequate (low) 19 18 5/20 5/20
Central attack poor (low) wretched (very low) 10 5 3/20 2/20
Left attack inadequate (high) poor (low) 19 10 5/20 3/20
Indirect set pieces
Defence poor (very high) inadequate (very low) 12 17 3/20 5/20
Attack poor (very high) poor (very high) 12 12 3/20 3/20
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Attack on wings
Tactic skill solid solid 7 7 7/20 7/20


0 - 1  Patrick Claydon 10'
0 - 2  Wacław Zdrot 21'
0 - 3  Patrick Claydon 25'
0 - 4  Johannes Lyysaari 32'
1 - 4  Lauri Valtamo 35'
1 - 5  Patrick Claydon 43'
2 - 5  Lajos Kanyó 74'
2 - 6  Patrick Claydon 89'
Jouni Hietanen 41'
Marcos Leiva 29'
Substitution Out Marcos Leiva
In Masaya Tsukahara
Substitution Out  Antti Torniainen
In  Joona Witikkala
Substitution Out  Henri Hanhineva
In  Diego Steinhard
Formation Out  Lauri Valtamo
In  Eskild Henze
Offensive To  Normal
RW  To  RF
4-5-1  To  4-4-2



Chance distribution

Home Away
6 10

1 Left attack 4
3 Central attack 1
1 Right attack 1
1 Other 3
0 Special events 1
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence poor (very high) inadequate (very low) 12 17 3/20 5/20
Attack poor (very high) poor (very high) 12 12 3/20 3/20


Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Attack on wings
Tactic skill solid solid 7 7 7/20 7/20

Average ratings

Total player experience poor (low) weak (high) 10 15 3/20 4/20
Average midfield weak (high) weak (very low) 15 13 4/20 4/20
Average defence poor (very high) excellent (low) 12 30 3/20 8/20
Average attack weak (very high) poor (high) 16 11 4/20 3/20
Total average weak (low) inadequate (low) 14 18 4/20 5/20


Rate this page
Server 096