We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

PaTe 0 - 2 Metsis

Dark skies made the crowd of 983 at Sointulan Wembley a little nervous, but the rain held off. Hubert Guillas was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Domagoj Šimurina and . Although the formal home team was PaTe, the spectators were of course much preferring Metsis. PaTe tactics involved an interesting 5-4-1 combination. They fielded: Sladić - Lyysaari, Tamés, Kolmonen, Avşar, Tonteri - Küstennebel, Claydon, Nummenranta, Tsukahara - Zdrot.

Metsis started off with a 4-5-1 lineup. The following players took the field: Ritari - Nergård, Sydänmetsä, Suomalainen, Hägerin - de Gier, Pakarinen, Vihijärvi, Gustafsson, Perälä - Nurmirinta.

The wings were the focus of most of PaTe's attacks on this day, taking advantage of their excellent level with that tactic. A penalty was given after 14 minutes, allowing the visitors to gain the lead: 0 - 1. Even Nergård was the scorer. In a rapid move 24 minutes into the match, Jan-Chris de Gier of Metsis lost his man and passed the ball to the unmarked Jorma Nurmirinta who easily hit it home to make it 0 - 2. Luckily the ref didn't see him taunting the opposing fans in celebration - naughty boy! 25 minutes into the game, Metsis worked the left side industriously creating several opportunities to add to their lead, but just couldn't apply the finishing touch. After 37 minutes, Metsis's Jan-Chris de Gier fell awkwardly, but was determined to stay in the match. That's the spirit! The bench was restless, and with 40 minutes passed PaTe's coach gave Jim Sjögård the opportunity the player had been hoping for. Patrick Claydon reluctantly left the field. 0 - 2 was the halftime score. Metsis enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 71 percent of possession.

Although the whole team were struggling to impress, PaTe's Wacław Zdrot was singled out as being the problem as he was called off the pitch after 46 minutes. Arthit Dhammachayo was given a chance to change things around. A lovely run by Metsis's Jan-Chris de Gier left his markers for dead and should have resulted in a goal, but the finish went just wide. PaTe had a great opportunity to score following a counterattack after 72 minutes, but Sami Nummenranta's shot from the left sailed high over the bar. Metsis had most of the ball, with 69 percent of possession.

The most dominating PaTe player was without a doubt Arthit Dhammachayo. On the other hand, Svetozar Sladić's play was disheartening. Metsis's best player was Veikka Vihijärvi. Juho Ritari on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 0 - 2.

Rating details

Midfield poor (low) passable (very high) 10 24 3/20 6/20
Right defence formidable (high) formidable (high) 35 35 9/20 9/20
Central defence excellent (very low) excellent (very high) 29 32 8/20 8/20
Left defence formidable (very high) formidable (very low) 36 33 9/20 9/20
Right attack weak (high) solid (low) 15 26 4/20 7/20
Central attack poor (very low) poor (very low) 9 9 3/20 3/20
Left attack passable (high) inadequate (low) 23 18 6/20 5/20
Indirect set pieces
Defence inadequate (high) passable (low) 19 22 5/20 6/20
Attack weak (very low) weak (very high) 13 16 4/20 4/20
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Normal
Tactic skill excellent (no tactic) 8 (no tactic) 8/20


0 - 1  Even Nergård 14'
0 - 2  Jorma Nurmirinta 24'
Jan-Chris de Gier 37'
Substitution Out  Patrick Claydon
In  Jim Sjögård
Substitution Out  Wacław Zdrot
In  Arthit Dhammachayo



Chance distribution

Home Away
1 11

1 Left attack 3
0 Central attack 4
0 Right attack 1
0 Other 1
0 Special events 2
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence inadequate (high) passable (low) 19 22 5/20 6/20
Attack weak (very low) weak (very high) 13 16 4/20 4/20


Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Normal
Tactic skill excellent (no tactic) 8 (no tactic) 8/20

Average ratings

Total player experience weak (very high) passable (low) 16 22 4/20 6/20
Average midfield poor (low) passable (very high) 10 24 3/20 6/20
Average defence formidable (very low) formidable (very low) 33 33 9/20 9/20
Average attack weak (very high) inadequate (low) 16 18 4/20 5/20
Total average inadequate (very high) solid (very low) 20 25 5/20 7/20


Server 095