We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 3/10 next 5/10 

Dreamers 1 - 2 lopu

Clouds darkened the skies at Chuck Norris dream stadium as 23385 spectators turned up for the match. was the appointed referee with assistance provided by and . Our studio analysts were correct. Dreamers has taken the field in a 4-4-2 alignment. The following players had been selected: Silvestro - Larsen, Bogucki, Lācis, Rodríguez - Schilperoort, Mirošević, Shlyakhtenko, Schrama - Ben-Yaacov, Bælum.

After thorough analysis and consultation of astrological charts, lopu decided to go with a 3-5-2 formation. Lineup: Rajala - Vergelis, Magarevich, Agiriano - Podsevalov, Charles, Murugov, Zīle, Veckungs - Lattimer, Gorenčič.

Dreamers saw most attack opportunities on the wings by using their outstanding ability to push the attack in the right direction. lopu seemed to prefer attacking in the middle, using their magical ability to great effect. With 31 minutes played, Dreamers's E. Bælum received a yellow card for challenging a play with his cleats first. The bleachers were silenced after 35 minutes when lopu's K. Veckungs put the guests ahead 0 - 1, following an attack on the right. It was obvious that Dreamers had instructions to attack on the wings instead of in the middle. The teams went for the halftime break at 0 - 1. Dreamers did a good job holding on to the ball, with 55 percent of possession.

Some things can only be learned through experience, and J. Lācis should take his lesson to heart after nearly gifting lopu a goal after 55 minutes. J. Lācis pulled a rabbit out of his hat as he wove through the guest's entire central defense and put the 1 - 1 equalizer away after 61 minutes. lopu players heard their coach's words ringing in their ears and steered their wing attacks to the middle instead. lopu took the lead 63 minutes into the game, making the score 1 - 2 after some elegant movement down the middle. S. Gorenčič was the scorer. Dreamers's P. Bogucki attempted to equalize 64 minutes into the game, coming in from the right, but the ball hit the post and the defense dealt with the rebound easily. lopu were able to draw a foul with their counter-attacks, but the shot from K. Magarevich went into the arms of the keeper. It was obvious that lopu had instructions to attack in the middle when they directed a break on the wing into the center of the park. P. Agiriano was, after 68 minutes, almost able to extend the visitors' lead with a well placed diving header after the ball had looped into the center, but the home side's keeper A. Silvestro made the save. The Count appeared on the jumbotron and announced that lopu had 52...52 percent possession. AH AH AH!

The most outstanding Dreamers player was without a doubt R. Schilperoort. You can tell it was nickel beer night yesterday at the local bar because Y. Ben-Yaacov seemed to stumble all over the pitch. lopu's best player was S. Gorenčič. Even six year old fans were wincing at the poor play by K. Magarevich today. The match ends 1 - 2.

Rating details

Midfield weak (very high) poor (very high) 16 12 4/20 3/20
Right defense inadequate (very high) weak (very high) 20 16 5/20 4/20
Central defense outstanding (low) inadequate (high) 38 19 10/20 5/20
Left defense outstanding (low) inadequate (high) 38 19 10/20 5/20
Right attack wretched (low) solid (very high) 6 28 2/20 7/20
Central attack poor (very high) formidable (low) 12 34 3/20 9/20
Left attack weak (very low) passable (high) 13 23 4/20 6/20
Indirect set pieces
Defense passable (low) passable (low) 22 22 6/20 6/20
Attack weak (low) passable (very high) 14 24 4/20 6/20
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Attack in the middle
Tactic skill outstanding magical 10 18 10/20 18/20


0 - 1  K. Veckungs 35'
1 - 1  J. Lācis 61'
1 - 2  S. Gorenčič 63'
1 card accumulated E. Bælum 31'



Chance distribution

Home Away
6 5

0 Left attack 0
2 Central attack 2
4 Right attack 1
0 Other 1
0 Special events 1
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defense passable (low) passable (low) 22 22 6/20 6/20
Attack weak (low) passable (very high) 14 24 4/20 6/20


Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Attack in the middle
Tactic skill outstanding magical 10 18 10/20 18/20

Average ratings

Total player experience passable (high) solid (low) 23 26 6/20 7/20
Average midfield weak (very high) poor (very high) 16 12 4/20 3/20
Average defense excellent (very high) inadequate (low) 32 18 8/20 5/20
Average attack poor (low) solid (very high) 10 28 3/20 7/20
Total average inadequate (high) inadequate (high) 19 19 5/20 5/20


Server 096