We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 3/4 next 1/4 
It was an exceptionally sunny day for the crowd of 12000 that came out to FK Svēte Arena. was the appointed referee with assistance provided by and . People from all over Jelgava had joined up for the derby. A 4-4-2 alignment was the formation of choice for Svēte. The following players took the field: Dunders - Protsenko, Pekhtin, Vecpuisis, Makstenieks - Runcis, Kharebov, Bass, Briksnis - Teteris, Gailišs.

Nežēlīgi decided to use a 4-4-2 set up. Starters: Zustenieks - Elsts, Danchenko, Lasmanis, Tirvilis - Kalniņš, Liepiņš, Krievs, Leitāns - Apsīts, Vindačs.

The sun seemed to put Niks Lasmanis in a great mood, and he showed off his technical skills all match long. Svēte broke through on the left 35 minutes into the game, with Lotārs Gailišs firing in from an acute angle to give the home side a 1 - 0 lead. 1 - 0 was the halftime score. Svēte enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 56 percent of possession.

The heat made it a terrible day for Vladislav Protsenko, who seemed unable to keep up with the other players. Nežēlīgi's Edvīns Kalniņš had to watch the rest of the game from the sidelines, after twisting his ankle with 59 minutes having been played. Toms Dambriedis was the replacement. Svēte increased the lead as Pēteris Bass struck to make the score 2 - 0 after an attack from the left left him unmarked in front of the keeper. 84 minutes in, Svēte's Vladislav Protsenko received a yellow card for going into a challenge studs first. The player down was Ermīns Zustenieks. The Nežēlīgi bench looked worried for a while, but in the end he managed to get up. After 86 minutes, Vladislav Protsenko sent the corner kick right to Gundars Briksnis who headed it sharply past the keeper. 3 - 0! After this, you could see that the players of Svēte were more interested in killing time than scoring more goals. Svēte's Gundars Briksnis got himself booked for a foul. A loud groan was heard from the fans of Nežēlīgi, as Salvis Krievs left the pitch in too much pain to finish the match. Rolands Salna took his place on the field. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by Svēte, with 55 percent of the ball.

Svēte's best player was Guntis Makstenieks. On the other hand, Nauris Dunders's play was disheartening. The most dominating Nežēlīgi player was without a doubt Toms Dambriedis. Eigars Apsīts on the other hand, had a terrible day. The match ends 3 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield disastrous (very high) disastrous (high) 4 3 1/20 1/20
Right defence wretched (very low) disastrous (very high) 5 4 2/20 1/20
Central defence poor (low) wretched (high) 10 7 3/20 2/20
Left defence poor (very high) wretched (low) 12 6 3/20 2/20
Right attack disastrous (very high) wretched (very low) 4 5 1/20 2/20
Central attack disastrous (high) disastrous (high) 3 3 1/20 1/20
Left attack wretched (very low) wretched (very low) 5 5 2/20 2/20
Indirect set pieces
Defence wretched (very high) wretched (high) 8 7 2/20 2/20
Attack wretched (high) wretched (high) 7 7 2/20 2/20
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)



Chance distribution

Home Away
9 2

2 Left attack 0
6 Central attack 0
0 Right attack 1
0 Other 1
1 Special events 0
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence wretched (very high) wretched (high) 8 7 2/20 2/20
Attack wretched (high) wretched (high) 7 7 2/20 2/20


Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)

Average ratings

Total player experience wretched (very low) wretched (high) 5 7 2/20 2/20
Average midfield disastrous (very high) disastrous (high) 4 3 1/20 1/20
Average defence poor (very low) wretched (low) 9 6 3/20 2/20
Average attack disastrous (very high) disastrous (very high) 4 4 1/20 1/20
Total average wretched (low) disastrous (very high) 6 4 2/20 2/20


Rate this page
Server 095