We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 9/10 next 1/10 
Dark skies made the crowd of 24050 at ESTADIO New Eagle a little nervous, but the rain held off. Ismael del Campo Gortazar was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Jan Lindhhult and Hylke Zinkstok. Everyone was excited about the upcoming Lisboa rivalry match and the crowd was divided evenly. Our studio analysts were correct. Salevido has taken the field in a 3-5-2 alignment. Lineup: Pietrek - Evgrafov, Sobočan, Kolářík - Eckstrand, Zabdyr, Sârbu, Rajavuori, Sala - Hallanaro, Cardoso.

The head coach flashed hand signals from the sideline and Krakow formed up in a 5-4-1 combination. Let's hope the opposing sideline wasn't filming that. Starters: Kvarnborn - Faria, Mantilla, de Sousa, Brusco, Rocha Gonçalves - Pladellorens, Andersson, Jovanović, Martins - Nunes.

Like the adage "bend but don't break", Salevido will rely on their solid ability to counter-attack today. It was an obvious ambition of Krakow to play a wide game with their supernatural ability to attack down the wings. Krakow had a good opportunity to score the go-ahead goal after a combination on the right but the home team's keeper L. Pietrek saved V. de Sousa's shot that was headed straight to the top corner. Against a lesser team, Krakow could very well have succeeded with their smart indirect free kick combination after 25 minutes. A trio of passes took the ball all the way past the defenders, but by then the intended recipient was blocked off and the keeper could make a leisurely save. The teams went for the halftime break at 0 - 0. Salevido did a good job holding on to the ball, with 51 percent of possession.

The bleachers were silenced after 47 minutes when Krakow's H. Brusco put the guests ahead 0 - 1, following an attack on the right. P. Nunes had put in a good 55 minutes and left the field with a smile on his face due to his team's lead. S. Bonnemann was the replacement. The bench was restless, and with 75 minutes gone Salevido's coach gave T. Malho the opportunity to try to change the team's fortunes. F. Sobočan reluctantly left the field. After 80 minutes, Salevido substituted E. Cardoso for F. Ribeiro, hoping for a quick impact on the field. The Krakow players could smell victory in the air. M. Jovanović wasn't in a hurry to leave the field as he was substituted for C. Che Hang after 83 minutes. The Count appeared on the jumbotron and announced that Salevido had 51...51 percent possession. AH AH AH!

F. Sala performed admirably for Salevido. Good thing J. Zabdyr isn't a horse, because he'd surely be sent to the glue factory after that performance. Krakow's best player was C. Che Hang. Even six year old fans were wincing at the poor play by U. Kvarnborn today. The match ends 0 - 1.

Rating details

Midfield inadequate (high) inadequate (high) 19 19 5/20 5/20
Right defense excellent (low) excellent (very low) 30 29 8/20 8/20
Central defense excellent (very low) formidable (very low) 29 33 8/20 9/20
Left defense excellent (high) solid (very low) 31 25 8/20 7/20
Right attack passable (very high) solid (high) 24 27 6/20 7/20
Central attack solid (very low) poor (very low) 25 9 7/20 3/20
Left attack excellent (very high) disastrous (very high) 32 4 8/20 1/20
Indirect set pieces
Defense inadequate (very high) inadequate (high) 20 19 5/20 5/20
Attack inadequate (very low) weak (low) 17 14 5/20 4/20
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Counter-attacks Attack on wings
Tactic skill solid supernatural 7 14 7/20 14/20


0 - 1  H. Brusco 47'
Substitution Out  P. Nunes
In  S. Bonnemann
Substitution Out  F. Sobočan
In  T. Malho
Substitution Out  E. Cardoso
In  F. Ribeiro
Substitution Out  M. Jovanović
In  C. Che Hang



Chance distribution

Home Away
1 7

0 Left attack 1
1 Central attack 0
0 Right attack 3
0 Other 3
0 Special events 0
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defense inadequate (very high) inadequate (high) 20 19 5/20 5/20
Attack inadequate (very low) weak (low) 17 14 5/20 4/20


Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Counter-attacks Attack on wings
Tactic skill solid supernatural 7 14 7/20 14/20

Average ratings

Total player experience passable (low) weak (very low) 22 13 6/20 4/20
Average midfield inadequate (high) inadequate (high) 19 19 5/20 5/20
Average defense excellent (low) excellent (very low) 30 29 8/20 8/20
Average attack solid (high) weak (very low) 27 13 7/20 4/20
Total average solid (very low) inadequate (very high) 25 20 7/20 6/20


Server 096