We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

Weather conditions were fairly good for football, and Cows Arena saw a crowd turnout of 25460. Angel Chachev was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Bill F. Murray and . A 5-4-1 alignment was the formation of choice for U-20 Suriname. The following players took the field: Ramautar - Barron, Gajadin, Wessels, Komproe, Bacchus - Loor, Latour, Rama, Manuel - Nesty.

U-20 Mongol Uls decided to use a 2-5-3 set up. They fielded: Delger - Mongke, Maidar - Saghit, Chinbatbold, Tuluy, Vitjun, Berke - Ganbold, Yesukai, Yarak.

For their match strategy, U-20 Suriname had decided to use their brilliant ability to counter-attack whenever possible. The strategy for U-20 Mongol Uls was to use their passable ability to press. At this time in the match, U-20 Mongol Uls were using their skill at pressing to successfully stifle the game. Saihan Vitjun gave the visitors the lead 13 minutes into the match to make it 0 - 1. The goal was scored from the penalty spot after a handball in the penalty area. With 21 minutes played, Gerel Tuluy of U-20 Mongol Uls fell dramatically just outside the penalty area. However, the referee was unimpressed, and booked him for diving. Ricardo Wessels of U-20 Suriname was booked for kicking the ball away after the whistle. 29 minutes into the game, U-20 Suriname seemed a little tentative in their play as their organization fell to passable. U-20 Mongol Uls's Enq Yarak got himself booked for a foul. 37 minutes into the game, U-20 Mongol Uls had difficulty finding their positions and their organisation dropped to solid. 41 minutes in, U-20 Mongol Uls's Hulagu Saghit received a yellow card for going into a challenge studs first. Due to a severely mistimed tackle, Eersel Ramautar of U-20 Suriname spent some time on the grass writhing in agony before he could get up and continue the game. 43 minutes in, U-20 Suriname appeared unsure on how to play and their organisation was only inadequate. The pressing tactics used by U-20 Mongol Uls were successful as the ball remained close to the half way line at all times. The teams went for the halftime break at 0 - 1. U-20 Mongol Uls enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 58 percent of possession.

Despite his frustration resulting in the smashing of a few teacups, the coach of U-20 Suriname was able to get his message across, and raised U-20 Suriname's organisation to solid. A review of the gameplan helped U-20 Mongol Uls get back to a solid organisation when the referee blew his whistle again. After a fatal mistake from the away team's right side defence 47 minutes into the match, an alert Clarence Nesty bagged the ball for U-20 Suriname, levelling the score to 1 - 1. 57 minutes into the game, U-20 Suriname seemed to suffer a certain amount of confusion and they fell to a inadequate level of organisation. Slack defending gave U-20 Suriname a chance to take the lead with 72 minutes played, but Rudi Manuel's cross from the left flank was fumbled in front of the goal and easily dealt with by the opposition. Tamin Bacchus behaved like an inexperienced youth player after 80 minutes as he gave the ball away to Hulagu Saghit. Lucky for him though, there was no goal. After 84 minutes, U-20 Suriname were awarded a free kick as their counter attack broke down. The set piece was lifted over the top, intended to open up the defence. However, the target man seemed to be taken by surprise, and could not reach the ball before it crossed the line for a goal kick. With 87 minutes of the game having been played, Ogotai Yesukai received a blow to the hip in a collision and was unable to continue. U-20 Mongol Uls, with no available replacements, now faced the prospect of finishing the game with a reduced number of players. Eersel Ramautar looked great 89 minutes into the match after stopping a shot from the middle of the penalty area from the visitors' Enq Yarak. The match ends 1 - 1. U-20 Mongol Uls claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 60 percent.

U-20 Suriname's top performer was clearly Michael Gajadin. However, Eersel Ramautar made a disastrous appearance. The most dominating U-20 Mongol Uls player was without a doubt Enq Yarak. Tortulakh Delger on the other hand, had a terrible day.

Rating details

Midfield poor (low) weak (low) 10 14 3/20 4/20
Right defence formidable (high) solid (very low) 35 25 9/20 7/20
Central defence brilliant (very low) inadequate (low) 41 18 11/20 5/20
Left defence excellent (very high) passable (high) 32 23 8/20 6/20
Right attack weak (low) weak (very low) 14 13 4/20 4/20
Central attack poor (very low) inadequate (high) 9 19 3/20 5/20
Left attack weak (high) inadequate (very low) 15 17 4/20 5/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (high) weak (low) 15 14 4/20 4/20
Attack poor (high) weak (very low) 11 13 3/20 4/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Counter-attacks Pressing
Tactic skill brilliant passable 11 6 11/20 6/20
Style of play 100% Defensive 100% Defensive
 

Share match result

Highlights

0 - 1  Saihan Vitjun 13'
1 - 1  Clarence Nesty 47'
1 booking accumulated Gerel Tuluy 21'
1 booking accumulated Ricardo Wessels 26'
1 booking accumulated Enq Yarak 37'
1 booking accumulated Hulagu Saghit 41'
Got bruised Eersel Ramautar 42'
Got injured Ogotai Yesukai 87'
Substitution Out Ogotai Yesukai
In No substitute
87'

Possession

42%
58%
40%
60%

Chance distribution

Home Away
5 7

2 Left attack 1
2 Central attack 2
0 Right attack 2
1 Other 1
0 Special events 1

Replays (10 times)

Home Draw Away
3 5 2

1,4 Average goals 1

This shows the results of 10 extra simulations of this game.
««
Average
0
5
10
0 - 1
15
20
Yellow card
25
Yellow card
Confusion
30
35
Yellow card
Confusion
40
Yellow card
Got bruised
Confusion
45
45
1 - 1
50
55
Confusion
60
65
70
75
80
85
Got injured
Substitution
90
»»

Rating details

Show all graphs

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence weak (high) weak (low) 15 14 4/20 4/20
Attack poor (high) weak (very low) 11 13 3/20 4/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Counter-attacks Pressing
Tactic skill brilliant passable 11 6 11/20 6/20
Style of play 100% Defensive 100% Defensive

Average ratings

Total player experience wretched (very high) poor (low) 8 10 2/20 3/20
Average midfield poor (low) weak (low) 10 14 3/20 4/20
Average defence formidable (very high) passable (low) 36 22 9/20 6/20
Average attack weak (very low) weak (very high) 13 16 4/20 4/20
Total average inadequate (very high) inadequate (very low) 20 17 5/20 5/20

Lineup




 
 
Rate this page
Server 096