We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

25542 fans braved the pouring rain at Volksparkaquarium. Francesco Stoto was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Alfredo Soto and Piero Pisciotta. The pitch was a disaster, due to all the rain. This spelled problems for the more sophisticated players, who usually could rely on speed or technique. For those relying on grit and strength, it actually meant an edge. They fielded: Brousek - Aalderen, Gentil-Lloch - Lapčić, Challandes, Johansson, Udommungkalanon, Blich - Harksen, Sigurmundsson, Becks.

The following players took the field: Novăcean - Alleyne, Ferrão, Dierichs, Patrocínio, Garderes - Afflick, Opiyo, Mayhill, Shqair, Jermen -.

1.FC Fischmund entered the field in a 2-5-3 formation. The visitors, soca memos, chose to start the game with a 5-5-0 lineup. Counter-attacking seemed to be the preferred strategy of memos, taking advantage of their formidable level with that tactic. The referee showed Fischmund's Chitawee Udommungkalanon the yellow card after a particularly nasty challenge. Fischmund were very close to putting themselves one up after 19 minutes as Gandalf Becks got through on the left. However, his concentration failed him, and he shot wide. Fischmund's Dino Lapčić tried to break through in the middle repeatedly, but couldn't get past the visitors' defenders. memos's defence sent a ball soaring up the middle on a beautiful counterattack with 32 minutes gone, but Vlado Jermen's finish was met by the reaching hands of the keeper. 38 minutes into the game, Malik Shqair broke up a promising Fischmund attack single-handedly, using just the right amount of physical pressure on the ball holder. 40 minutes in, memos's Vlado Jermen received a yellow card for going into a challenge studs first. It was 0 - 0 at the break. Possession in the forty-five minutes was dominated by Fischmund, with 55 percent of the ball.

A badly positioned defensive formation on a free kick after 54 minutes led to memos's Jürgen Dierichs giving the visitors the lead 0 - 1. After a scuffle in the guests' penalty area 64 minutes into the game, the home team was awarded a penalty. Ibo Harksen scored to make it 1 - 1. Fischmund's Adam Aalderen got himself booked for a foul. With 69 minutes gone, Fischmund's Chitawee Udommungkalanon had to leave the pitch after talking back to the referee and receiving his second booking. The match ends 1 - 1. Fischmund claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 54 percent.

Fischmund's top performer was clearly Ibo Harksen. Vilém Brousek turned in a dismal performance, however. memos's best player was Alexandru Novăcean. However, Cristóvão Patrocínio made a disastrous appearance.

Rating details

Midfield weak (low) poor (high) 14 11 4/20 3/20
Right defence solid (very low) world class (very low) 25 49 7/20 13/20
Central defence inadequate (very low) brilliant (very high) 17 44 5/20 11/20
Left defence solid (very low) brilliant (very high) 25 44 7/20 11/20
Right attack formidable (low) poor (very low) 34 9 9/20 3/20
Central attack outstanding (very high) disastrous (low) 40 2 10/20 1/20
Left attack outstanding (high) wretched (very high) 39 8 10/20 2/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence solid (very low) excellent (very low) 25 29 7/20 8/20
Attack inadequate (very high) inadequate (high) 20 19 5/20 5/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Counter-attacks
Tactic skill (no tactic) formidable (no tactic) 9 9/20
Style of play Neutral Neutral
 

Possession

55%
45%
54%
46%

Chance distribution

Home Away
5 3

2 Left attack 1
1 Central attack 1
0 Right attack 0
2 Other 1
0 Special events 0
««
Average
0
5
Yellow card
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Yellow card
45
45
50
0 - 1
55
60
1 - 1
65
Yellow card
Sent off
70
75
80
85
90
»»

Rating details

Show all graphs

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence solid (very low) excellent (very low) 25 29 7/20 8/20
Attack inadequate (very high) inadequate (high) 20 19 5/20 5/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Counter-attacks
Tactic skill (no tactic) formidable (no tactic) 9 9/20
Style of play Neutral Neutral

Average ratings

Total player experience weak (very low) inadequate (very low) 13 17 4/20 5/20
Average midfield weak (low) poor (high) 14 11 4/20 3/20
Average defence passable (low) magnificent (low) 22 46 6/20 12/20
Average attack outstanding (very low) wretched (low) 37 6 10/20 2/20
Total average passable (very high) passable (very low) 24 21 7/20 6/20

Lineup




 
 
Rate this page
Server 096