We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

The weather was pretty good, and a crowd of 20294 had shown up at The Loo for the match. Pierre Matignon was the appointed referee with assistance provided by Luither Lehrberger and Axel Ylimäki. Lineup: Debrulle - Carrette, Franzen - Sobaszek, Cuvelier, Paternostre, Vercauteren, Dörfler - Pouč, Bogaert, Van der Mijnsbrugge.

The following players had been chosen: Holzmeister - Balboa, Fortis, Goulbourne - Rivasplata, Biggs, Gripenstål, Barrett, Bravetti - Bălaşa, Carriero.

W.C. Brussels fielded a 2-5-3 lineup. For Q.T.JIMA, the formation of choice was 3-5-2. A questionable penalty 30 minutes in gave the home side the lead, 1 - 0. The visitors' goalie didn't stand a chance as Josef Pouč knocked the ball home. The teams went for the halftime break at 1 - 0. Possession in this half belonged to W.C.'s, who controlled the ball 52 percent of the time.

After 46 minutes, Q.T.JIMA switched Martino Carriero with Csaba Pomázi, hoping for a quick impact on the pitch. Although the whole team were struggling to impress, Q.T.JIMA's Giuseppe Bravetti was singled out as being the problem as he was called off the pitch after 46 minutes. Harmen-Jan Calkhoven was given a chance to change things around. The visiting team's Rafael Balboa was able to score the 1 - 1 equaliser with a header 47 minutes into the match, after some good work on the right. The visiting Octavian Bălaşa was booed thoroughly by the home crowd 60 minutes into the game, after he broke through the middle and scored, resulting in the visitors taking the lead. 1 - 2 was the score. The visitors' Alan Barrett took advantage of a misunderstanding between the home side's goalie and centre backs 62 minutes into the match. 1 - 3 for Q.T.JIMA. The Q.T.JIMA coach was visibly pleased with the score so far, but still ordered a few tactical changes 74 minutes into the game. The referee announced 1 minute of stoppage time, giving fans a slim hope that their team could get one more attack in before this was all over. After 89 minutes, an incisive pass through the middle gave Evaristo Rivasplata a chance to increase the lead for Q.T.JIMA, and he did not disappoint. The score was then 1 - 4. The match ends 1 - 4. Q.T.JIMA claimed to have seen most of the ball, and the statistics agreed with them - possession being 51 percent.

W.C.'s's best player was Josef Pouč. Frank Franzen on the other hand, had a terrible day. The most dominating Q.T.JIMA player was without a doubt Jan-Inge Gripenstål. On the other hand, Callum Goulbourne's play was disheartening.

Rating details

Midfield formidable (high) formidable (low) 35 34 9/20 9/20
Right defence poor (high) supernatural (low) 11 54 3/20 14/20
Central defence weak (high) supernatural (low) 15 54 4/20 14/20
Left defence poor (very high) supernatural (low) 12 54 3/20 14/20
Right attack passable (very high) brilliant (high) 24 43 6/20 11/20
Central attack excellent (very low) supernatural (very low) 29 53 8/20 14/20
Left attack passable (low) outstanding (low) 22 38 6/20 10/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence weak (low) excellent (high) 14 31 4/20 8/20
Attack weak (very high) solid (very high) 16 28 4/20 7/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)
Style of play 100% Defensive Neutral
 

Highlights

1 - 0  Josef Pouč 30'
1 - 1  Rafael Balboa 47'
1 - 2  Octavian Bălaşa 60'
1 - 3  Alan Barrett 62'
1 - 4  Evaristo Rivasplata 89'
Substitution Out  Martino Carriero
In  Csaba Pomázi
46'
Substitution Out  Giuseppe Bravetti
In  Harmen-Jan Calkhoven
46'
Behaviour Octavian Bălaşa
Normal  To  Defensive
74'

Possession

52%
48%
49%
51%

Chance distribution

Home Away
5 4

1 Left attack 0
3 Central attack 3
0 Right attack 1
1 Other 0
0 Special events 0
««
Average
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 - 0
35
40
45
45
Substitution
Substitution
1 - 1
50
55
60
1 - 2
1 - 3
65
70
New behaviour
75
80
85
1 - 4
90
»»

Rating details

Show all graphs

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence weak (low) excellent (high) 14 31 4/20 8/20
Attack weak (very high) solid (very high) 16 28 4/20 7/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Normal
Tactic skill (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic) (no tactic)
Style of play 100% Defensive Neutral

Average ratings

Total player experience solid (very high) solid (very low) 28 25 7/20 7/20
Average midfield formidable (high) formidable (low) 35 34 9/20 9/20
Average defence weak (very low) supernatural (low) 13 54 4/20 14/20
Average attack solid (very low) magnificent (very low) 25 45 7/20 12/20
Total average passable (very high) brilliant (very high) 24 44 7/20 12/20

Lineup




 
 
Rate this page
Server 095